Find Ancestors

George James was married to Ann, but i cant find out here surname, she appears in 1881 census as being born 1832 at Cadley Wiltshire, in the 1901 census appears as being born at South Savernake i think this is the same place, is there away of finding her surname out as i cant find her birth by looking for a ann born in Cadley in 1832.

When did they marry??

a possible -


1851 England Census
Name: Anne Brooks
Age: 18
Estimated birth year: abt 1833
Relation: Daughter
Father's Name: William
Gender: Female
Where born: South Savernake, Wiltshire, England

Civil parish: South Savernake
County/Island: Wiltshire
Country: England

Street Address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage:

Disability: View image

Registration district: Marlborough
Sub-registration district: Marlborough
ED, institution, or vessel: 17
Neighbors: View others on page
Household schedule number: 38
Household Members: Name Age
William Brooks 61
John Brooks 21
Hannah Brooks 20
Anne Brooks 18
Martha Brooks 15
James Brooks 13
George Brooks 11
Elizabeth Brooks 9
Sarah Brooks 7




Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece: 1838; Folio: 300; Page: 13; GSU roll: 220985.




Marriages Dec 1860 (>99%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

******Brookes Anne Marlbro 5a 171
Burd Anne Marlbro 5a 171
******James George Marlbro 5a 171
Witts Stephen Marlbro 5a 171

1881 in Preshute, Wiltshire

George James 60
Ann James 49
George Cullen 1
James Warburton 32

My visited links show that I have looked at the record for James Warburton before ... any connection? (He was born Bolton, Lancashire)

Did they have children? Do you have them in an earlier census?


choccy -- I think so. ;) I hadn't got to checking out the two Anns yet, but that's the only marriage in Marlborough reg dist.

In the census James Warburton was a lodger / border so i think he has no connection,

I figured there was no connection, just thought it funny I'd looked at the household before. ;) I guess if you hang around here long enough you'll eventually look at every household in the realm!

But no, actually -- it was in connection with your thread that involved the child George Cullen in the household, where I posted the 1881 James household:

http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards.asp?wci=thread&tk=1197862

... Again, we have related people in separate threads ...

In that case i would only ever have one thread per family tree, that cant be right