Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

trying to find marriage between richard kettlewell

Page 2 + 1 of 3

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 14 Mar 2009 21:24

Try looking on GR for Hannah Leather. that may bring up the entry


Got your pm ...... it really is Kettlewell on the image, so I am certain. Don't have time to do the changes today, but I will!



sylvia

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 14 Mar 2009 21:29

CAREFUL!!



Your Martha Jackson was born Belton, Lincolnshire, according to all the censuses we found


Martha Brooks married to John Smith Brooks on the 1901 was allegedly born in Yorkshire


1901 Census

Name: Martha R Brooks
Age: 60
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1841
Relation: Wife
Spouse's Name: John Smith
Gender: Female
Where born: Thorne, Yorkshire, England <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Civil Parish: Belton
Ecclesiastical parish: Belton All Saints
Town: Belton
County/Island: Lincolnshire
Country: England

Registration district: Thorne
Sub registration district: Epworth

John Smith Brooks 60
Martha R Brooks 60




Unless Belton Lincolnshire is really close to Thorne Yorkshire .................... I don't know that area!


sylvia

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 14 Mar 2009 21:38

???? Martha in 1841, with her parents


1841 Census

Name: Martha Jackson
Age: 4
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1837
Gender: Female
Where born: Lincolnshire, England

Civil Parish: Belton
Hundred: Manley (Western Division)
County/Island: Lincolnshire
Country: England

Registration district: Thorne
Sub registration district: Epworth

Wm Jackson 25 b.ca 1816, Lincolnshire, Ag Lab
Ann Jackson 25 b.ca 1816, Lincolnshire
Martha Jackson 4
Hannah Jackson 2 b.ca 1839, Lincolnshire

Address:- North Croft Field



Note that ages on the 1841 are deceptive .................... ages for adults over the age of 15 were lowered to the nearest 5, so people may have been born as many as 4 years earlier than shown.


sylvia

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 14 Mar 2009 21:43

Possible baptism for martha ............... Hannah and Ann were often interchangeable in early days


MARTHA RICHARDSON JACKSON Pedigree
Female

Event(s):
Birth:
Christening: 10 OCT 1836 Belton Near, Epworth, Lincoln, England

Parents:
Father: WILLIAM JACKSON Family
Mother: HANNAH

--------
Messages:
Extracted birth or christening record for the locality listed in the record. The source records are usually arranged chronologically by the birth or christening date.

-------
Source Information:
Batch No.: Dates: Source Call No.: Type: Printout Call No.: Type:
C027605 Film



- - - - -

and for Hannah


HANNAH JACKSON Pedigree
Female

Event(s):
Birth:
Christening: 17 FEB 1839 Belton Near, Epworth, Lincoln, England

Parents:
Father: WILLIAM JACKSON Family
Mother: ANNE

--------
Messages:
Extracted birth or christening record for the locality listed in the record. The source records are usually arranged chronologically by the birth or christening date.

-------
Source Information:
Batch No.: Dates: Source Call No.: Type: Printout Call No.: Type:
C027605






Bet Ann/Anne/Hannah was called Richardson!




sylvia

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 14 Mar 2009 21:52

and so she was!


WILLIAM JACKSON Pedigree
Male Family

Marriages:
Spouse: ANNE RICHARDSON Family
Marriage: 28 JAN 1835 Amcotts, Lincoln, England

---------
Messages:
Extracted marriage record for locality listed in the record. The source records are usually arranged chronologically by the marriage date.

---------
Source Information:
Batch No.: Dates: Source Call No.: Type: Printout Call No.: Type:
M026993 1542 - 1862 1450393 IT 2 Film NONE





You might be able to find a birth certificate for Hannah, but this marriage and Martha's birth took place before registration of bmds began on July 1 1837




I found this information on the International Genealogical Index on www.familysearch.org ................... this is the Mormon site.

On the Home page, click on Advanced Search, then click on International Genealogical Index

Just be sure that you accept only EXTRACTED records, these have been taken from the actual parish records. SUBMITTED records have been sent in by other people, mainly church members, and there is no backing documentation, so they have to treated with caution unless and until you can find such documentation.




Try to see if you can find possibles for William Jackson and Anne Richardson ...... remembering that Anne can be Ann or Hannah, but familysearch (unlike other sites) does do that bit for you!




sylvia

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 14 Mar 2009 21:55

1851 Census

Name: William Jackson
Age: 39
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1812
Relation: Head
Spouse's Name: Ann
Gender: Male
Where born: Belton, Lincolnshire, England

Civil Parish: Belton
County/Island: Lincolnshire
Country: England

Registration district: Thorne
Sub registration district: Epworth

William Jackson 39
Ann Jackson 38
Hannah Jackson 12
George Jackson 9
M Ann Jackson 6
Sarah Jackson 3
William Jackson 1 Mo





sylvia

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 14 Mar 2009 22:03

yep, I think you can find them!!


Just rmember that as you go further and further back, it becomes more and more common to find earlier births in the same family with the same name


child 1 is born, named and dies

child born after that given same name, dies

child born after that death given same name




this pattern is often repeated until a child eventually lives!!


I have 5 children with the same forename in one of my families! You can't say they didn't try! But ti does make it difficult for us ....... and one reason why you need to double check all and every information




sylvia

Tracey

Tracey Report 14 Mar 2009 22:17

I believe Thorne is near Belton and so think it must be the right person.
Both are not that far away from myself.
Also the granddaughter of john smith brooks says that Martha Kettlewell married her grandad and knows her previous husband was called richard. Therefore it does fit.

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 14 Mar 2009 22:21

OK ...... that sounds good!!


As I said, I don't know that area.


I was from Lancashire, and my knowledge of Yorkshire is more northerly ...... Leeds/York/Scarborough/Whitby etc


sylvia

Tracey

Tracey Report 14 Mar 2009 22:32

Got there at last.
Found the 1871 census for hannah leather and SARAH NAOMI. Printed it out and not letting it go again.
Thanks for your help on this one.

Tracey

Tracey Report 14 Mar 2009 22:38

Just found grandads brother William Kettlewell on the 1891 Census.
age 22, b1870, Boarder Farm Servant at 5 low road, Laughton, gainsborough.

1901 Census. age 32, b1869, Head of house, Ironstone miner, living at 34 School Lane, Messingham, Glanford Brigg.
wife Ada, age 32, b Blyton?? Lincs.
daughter Annie, age 8, b Messingham
son Richard, age 11 mth, b Messingham

Tracey

Tracey Report 14 Mar 2009 22:55

Got another one on 1901 Census, Walter Kettlewell.
head of house, age 29, living at 112 Taylors Row, Newhill Wath.
Pit yard labourer, born armthorpe.

Living with wife Sarah A., age 26, born Newhill.
son Geo, age 2, born wath.

(on a roll now, will come back to ann and william when i get stuck on this line. Thanks for the ann and william info, I don't know how you do it, and so fast too.)

Tracey

Tracey Report 14 Mar 2009 23:32

Spoke too soon about being on a roll. Can't find a definite John or Fredrick Kettlewell on the 1901 census.
Will try again tomorrow for these two and the others.
Time for bed now.
Thanks again Sylvia.

EvieBeavie

EvieBeavie Report 15 Mar 2009 01:55

Just to say, a little belatedly -- Thorne itself seems to have appeared under both Lincolnshire and Yorkshire in censuses.

All seems well here!