Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
A LITTLE MYSTERY I CANT WORK OUT.....
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Sophie | Report | 6 Mar 2009 22:29 |
No she was 18 when she married in 1893...she was born in 1875...charles tipping was born in 1869 so he was 24 at the time of the marriage.....and the one i found is defiently her because it states a fred tipping living with her....son of wife....it states the specific place of where he was born which matches freds birth cert. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sophie | Report | 6 Mar 2009 22:27 |
Rhoda was born 1875 in missenden, buckinghamshire; now from what ive just founf out on the 1911 census i thought ill have a look on the 1901 census...ive looked for a rhoda cox....nothin....so i thought id look for this daughter rhoda jeskins..........bingo....found a rhoda jeskins born 1898 in buckingham mother is a rhoda jeskins?...head of house is a herbert jeskins??? no fred to be seen...or even charles.....im very confuse now...... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 6 Mar 2009 22:22 |
All Rhoda Pearce's showing in 1911 |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 6 Mar 2009 22:20 |
The marraige in 1893 would make her only 13 !!!! |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 6 Mar 2009 22:14 |
1881? |
|||
|
Sophie | Report | 6 Mar 2009 22:14 |
ok this is reli weird, ive just looked on the 1911 census for a fred tipping and found a couple called harry and rhoda cox living in buckngham....ive looked into the record, the fred tipping is the exact match; it says that he is the son of the wife rhoda which would make sense..with the same place of birth..the mother has the same name age and place of birth but her name is rhoda cox and is living with husband harry cox??....where is charles???..it says that they have been married for 7 years?...how can her name be cox?..if her latter marriage says her first married name tipping?...plus the husband harry cox has the same occupation which is the exact same as the one given on the marriage cert of fred tippings for freds father charles??....this is reli weird now; also it states a daughter of rhoda with a different name....jeskins?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 6 Mar 2009 22:11 |
Does she have a sister Mary born 1866 when I use the tip that is on the boards to access the census Mary comes up as staying at the same address as Fred |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 6 Mar 2009 22:06 |
son Fred? |
|||
|
Penny | Report | 6 Mar 2009 22:06 |
if so, this could be her birth |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 6 Mar 2009 22:04 |
|
|||
|
Penny | Report | 6 Mar 2009 21:57 |
where was Rhoda born |
|||
|
Sophie | Report | 6 Mar 2009 21:50 |
well ive tried typin in different sounding names on the census but still no luck.....i know charles would ave been workin on the railway. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sophie | Report | 6 Mar 2009 21:23 |
Oh...rite sori.....i wont type like that then.... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 6 Mar 2009 21:21 |
Also, have you tried all possible variants for thei names, including completely the wrong name before saying they are not on either the 1901 or 1911 censuses. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 6 Mar 2009 21:20 |
How do you know he never had a middle name? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sophie | Report | 6 Mar 2009 21:09 |
NO THATS DEFINTLY NOT HIM; HE NEVER HAD A MIDDLE NAME AND ASSUMING THAT RHODA WAS STILL LIVING IN BUCKINGHAM WHEN SHE REMARRIED; CHARLES WOULD HAVE BEEN LIVING IN THE SAME AREA AS WELL....SO IM ASSUMING THAT HE DIED IN BUCKINGHAM TOO.....THE 1901 AND 1911 CENSUS MIGHT SHED SOME LIGHT BUT THE FAMILY IS NOT ON EITHER CENSUS...ITS LIKE IF THEY DISSAPPEARED.. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sophie | Report | 6 Mar 2009 20:50 |
HI ALL |
|||
Researching: |