Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

1911 census advice

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

ceri

ceri Report 30 Jun 2009 14:10

wow no wonder we didnt find them...they are listed as surname SEACH?

Vera

Vera Report 30 Jun 2009 14:11

On the 1901 census William Henry Leachs father and mother are on the same page ....as William and his wife and family.

Regards Vera

Vera

Vera Report 30 Jun 2009 14:12

All the mistranscriptions.....but when you see the original image you can understand why....:-)

Regards Vera

ceri

ceri Report 30 Jun 2009 14:14

Thank you ever so much Vera

are all the children on that 1891 census listed as children of Henry and Margaret?

and does it give William or Henry's occupation at all?

Vera

Vera Report 30 Jun 2009 14:17

Ian,
They are both Agricultural Labourer. A pleasure to help.
Regards Vera

Vera

Vera Report 30 Jun 2009 14:19

All are sons and daughters of Henry and Margaret.

Regards Vera

ceri

ceri Report 30 Jun 2009 14:21

that would sound about right as all that exists in Great Raveley is a farm, and if i remember correctly the address on the original scan is a certain number cottage on high holborn farm great raveley.

Vera

Vera Report 30 Jun 2009 14:24

1891 address is Cottage Lane

Regards Vera

Battenburg

Battenburg Report 30 Jun 2009 18:26

S and L are frequently mistranscribed