Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Thomas Risebury
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Kucinta | Report | 23 Dec 2010 00:26 |
Census 1911: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 23 Dec 2010 00:25 |
Good point Kucinta.... Unless the two brothers each spelt their names differently but that was probably just down to the registrar. |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 23 Dec 2010 00:13 |
Birth: Rasberry Robert John Goole 9c 791 OND 1884. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 23 Dec 2010 00:08 |
Do you mean two sisters married two brothers? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 23 Dec 2010 00:02 |
I would say a team effort all round. |
|||
|
Richard | Report | 23 Dec 2010 00:01 |
WOW SO MUCH INFORMATION. YOU GUYS ARE SO GOOD IN SUCH A SHORT TIME, LEAST i GOT LOTS OF LEADS. |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 22 Dec 2010 23:57 |
Bit late, but apparently Wells, Norfolk, is a sub district of Walsingham. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 22 Dec 2010 23:52 |
Well done Mike - Think you've cracked it. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 22 Dec 2010 23:51 |
Marriages Mar 1876 |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 22 Dec 2010 23:49 |
So Julia in 1881 and Elizabeth in 1891 are one and the same, born Wells? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 22 Dec 2010 23:48 |
Yes, the odds are that the first Thomas died so they named the next son the same name. |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 22 Dec 2010 23:43 |
Edward aged one in Mike's census 1881 might be the first Thomas Edward, so maybe the two Thomas Edwards were siblings; Richard was a labourer in census 1891, did he give up the sea? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 22 Dec 2010 23:40 |
Previous wife ? |
|||
|
Richard | Report | 22 Dec 2010 23:40 |
sorry Mike i dont. Just think that with the right spelling this is my man, but could not find any census data under that spelling of risebury |
|||
|
Richard | Report | 22 Dec 2010 23:40 |
sorry Mike i dont. Just think that with the right spelling this is my man, but could not find any census data under that spelling of risebury |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 22 Dec 2010 23:35 |
I think the Dec 1882 birth I posted above and have repeated here is more likely - though he may well have been a sib of the Thomas who died Jun qtr 1882. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 22 Dec 2010 23:34 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 22 Dec 2010 23:27 |
Do you have this certificate to check his father's name against his marriage cert ? |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 22 Dec 2010 23:05 |
Births Dec 1882 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Richard | Report | 22 Dec 2010 23:00 |
ty ALL X |