Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
George Mott B Circa1698 Essex
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
pittsy | Report | 20 Jun 2011 10:38 |
nudge |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
pittsy | Report | 20 Jun 2011 08:08 |
Before I lose you all - I have not been able to find anything more about Emma Mott B1836 Stanford Rivers - she is listed with parents in the 1841 census above. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 20 Jun 2011 07:54 |
You're welcome :-D |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
pittsy | Report | 20 Jun 2011 07:49 |
Astra That explains it then. Appreciate this. Pittsy |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 20 Jun 2011 07:46 |
Williamm re-married in 1842 so he could have been widowed which is why Susan is with her grand parents in 1841 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
pittsy | Report | 20 Jun 2011 07:37 |
I think this could be the same person. It would be unusual for sometime to name someone Susan after already having a daughter Susannah alive and well at the time of her birth. I am going to remove her from the John Mott Mary Holgate children's list and this is why I have never been able to find her ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 20 Jun 2011 07:28 |
This is William with daughter Susanna. Is it possible she was a Grand daughter in 1841. Was William their son? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
pittsy | Report | 20 Jun 2011 07:28 |
Astra |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 20 Jun 2011 07:20 |
John and Mary perhaps?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
pittsy | Report | 20 Jun 2011 07:15 |
She would have been born at Stanford Rivers like all the other siblings were. It is a bit confusing because it is strange to call one child Susannah born 3/11/1822 S Rivers who married George barnard and then call your last child Susan. It has always been a mystery to me. This is the family in 1851. Susannah had married in 1846 but no Susan ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 20 Jun 2011 07:11 |
Name: Susannah Mott |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 20 Jun 2011 07:10 |
1841 parents in 1851? |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 20 Jun 2011 07:06 |
Do you have any evidence she is still alive in 1851 (apart from lack of any obvious death?) |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 20 Jun 2011 06:54 |
I think Susannah also exists in the 1841 so maybe not the same person |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
K | Report | 20 Jun 2011 06:49 |
Looks possible she was registered as Susannah |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lynski | Report | 20 Jun 2011 06:43 |
????????? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
pittsy | Report | 20 Jun 2011 06:33 |
Can anyone help. The only information I have is this Census entry |
|||
Researching: |