Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Marriage Search help
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Solar | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:08 |
Hi, I'm trying to find a marriage record for a George Hambidge. From the 1871 census I have his year of birth as 1811, Eaton Hastings, Berkshire. I know he married a Rachel but I cannot find any marriage record or details of her maiden name. |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:11 |
have you found Louisa.s birth cert ? it will name her mum |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Solar | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:13 |
Hi, no I haven't ordered that as of yet, trying to see what I can find online beforehand. |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:13 |
1861?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:15 |
Different family that doesn't show on the 1861 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:17 |
looks like you may have to get her birth cert |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:18 |
This looks like daughter's birth. |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:20 |
they have granchldren on the 1871 so may well have married pre 1837 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:23 |
wonder if this is a son |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:26 |
interesting from the 1851 !! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Solar | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:27 |
Hi, thanks for this but cannot see that it is a match. Just seen the 1871 census on FamilySearch.org |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:29 |
he seems to be unmarried in 1841 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Solar | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:29 |
oopps, sorry didnt see all your great replies for I just attached copy of 1871 census, will have a read through now. |
|||
|
Solar | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:33 |
The 1851 census is very intersting, thanks for that Shirley, Interesting but rather confusing :-) |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:35 |
Yes it does look odd Rachel is down as a widow and his housekeeper. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Solar | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:38 |
I wonder if perhaps she was married to his brother then became a widow, hence having the same surname and she then went onto have children with George? Mystery |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:39 |
Looks like she was a live-in housekeeper in 1851 and eventually took on the roll of wife but ....Maybe they never married. |
|||
|
Solar | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:45 |
umm think you are probably right, only the certificate will tell me for sure I guess so I'm going to get on and order it. |
|||
|
Solar | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:51 |
Sorry just thinking, is anyone able to provide me with details of the 1841 census, I can see just by searching the Son James 1841 that he is 0 on the 1841 census, would like to show what it acually states on there |
|||
|
MaureeninNY | Report | 30 Jul 2012 12:59 |
Confusing. This seems to suggest her maiden name was Ockwell: |