Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

William lovatt

Page 0 + 1 of 2

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. »
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

greyghost

greyghost Report 30 Jun 2013 18:12

?? Deaths of Sarah and Mary

Civil Registration event: Death

Name: LOVATT, Sarah
Registration district: Wolstanton
County: Staffordshire
Year of registration: 1872
Quarter of registration: Apr-May-Jun
Age at death: 0
Volume no: 6B
Page no: 71


Civil Registration event: Death

Name: LOVATT, Mary
Registration district: Wolstanton
County: Staffordshire
Year of registration: 1879
Quarter of registration: Jul-Aug-Sep
Age at death: 1
Volume no: 6B
Page no: 57

greyghost

greyghost Report 30 Jun 2013 18:08

Annie Chesters in Tunstall 1871
1871 census transcription details for: America Street, Tunstall, Stoke Upon Trent

National Archive Reference:
RG number: RG10
Piece: 2848
Folio: 38
Page: 14
Reg. District: Wolstanton
Sub District: Tunstall
Parish: Tunstall
Enum. District: 19
Ecclesiastical District:
City/Municipal Borough: Stoke upon Trent
Address: America Street, Tunstall, Stoke Upon Trent
County: Staffordshire
Name Relation Condition Sex Age Birth Year Occupation Where Born
CLAYTON, Joseph Head M 24 1847 Shropshire
CLAYTON, Sarah Wife F 23 1848 Staffordshire
CLAYTON, Jane Daughter F 4 1867 Staffordshire
CLAYTON, Thomas Son M 2 1869 Staffordshire
PEAKE, Lizzie Boarder F 12 1859 Staffordshire
CHESTERS, Annie Boarder F 20 1851 Cheshire<<<<Audlem

LondonBelle

LondonBelle Report 30 Jun 2013 17:52

Possible remarriage?

Marriages Sep 1894
Lovat_ Ann Wolstanton 6b 228
Stanway Thomas Wolstanton 6b 228

Christina(Lancashire)

Christina(Lancashire) Report 30 Jun 2013 17:52

Jean, where and when was Ann Chesters born? Is she the one born in Audlem, or is that a different Ann?

Christina(Lancashire)

Christina(Lancashire) Report 30 Jun 2013 17:48

Yes it all fits Stuart. Just no Sarah or Mary, unless they'd died by 1881 , or were staying with relatives?

Jean

Jean Report 30 Jun 2013 17:43

Thank you to everyone that has tried to help me this afternoon, i'm very sorry for wasting your time, it looks as though I was barking up the wrong tree.

Thank You
Jean

LondonBelle

LondonBelle Report 30 Jun 2013 17:43

Possibly, William died and Ann nee Chester remarried?

1901 census

Name: Betsy Lovatt
Age: 19
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1882
Relation: Stepdaughter
Mother's Name: Ann Stanway
Gender: Female
Where born: Tunstall, Staffordshire, England

Civil Parish: Tunstall
Ecclesiastical parish: Christchurch
County/Island: Staffordshire
Country: England

Street Address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage:

Education:

Employment status:

View Image

Registration District: Wolstanton
Sub-registration District: Tunstall
ED, institution, or vessel: 20
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Schedule Number: 141
Piece: 2591
Folio: 83
Page Number: 23
Household Members:
Name Age
Thomas Stanway 52
Ann Stanway 50
John Lovatt 24
Betsy Lovatt 19

greyghost

greyghost Report 30 Jun 2013 17:42

Christina, I was also looking at that William and Ann in the 1881. The children are the right age for a 1871 marriage and it's all in the right area

Christina(Lancashire)

Christina(Lancashire) Report 30 Jun 2013 17:37

Oops sorry Marie, hadn't noticed you'd found James before I added him to list above. :-)

MarieCeleste

MarieCeleste Report 30 Jun 2013 17:33

Jean, she DID marry a William Lovatt but not the one you thought you'd found on the 1881 - there were quite a few men in the area of that name.

Christina(Lancashire)

Christina(Lancashire) Report 30 Jun 2013 17:33

Was Ann Chesters born in Audlem?

This may be her in 1881.....


1881 England Census
Name: Annie Lovatt
Age: 30
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1851
Relation: Wife
Spouse's Name: William Lovatt
Gender: Female
Where born: Audlem, Cheshire, England
Civil Parish: Wolstanton
County/Island: Staffordshire
Country: England
Street Address: 3 Wedgwood St
Condition as to marriage: Married
Education:

Employment status:

Subscribe now to see this information.
Registration District: Wolstanton
Sub-registration District: Tunstall
ED, institution, or vessel: 17
Neighbors: View others on page
Piece: 2710
Folio: 31
Page Number: 13
Household Members:
Name Age
William Lovatt 32.......Potter
Annie Lovatt 30
William Lovatt 8
John Lovatt 5

All others born in Tunstall.

Edited to add William's occupation and place of birth.

MarieCeleste

MarieCeleste Report 30 Jun 2013 17:32

Another possible birth:

Surname Forename(s) Sub-District Registers At Mother's Maiden Name
LOVATT James Tunstall Stoke-On-Trent CHESTERS 1888

greyghost

greyghost Report 30 Jun 2013 17:30

??
1871 census transcription details for: Field's Farm, Betley

National Archive Reference:
RG number: RG10
Piece: 2837
Folio: 67
Page: 35
Reg. District: Newcastle under Lyme
Sub District: Audley
Parish: Betley
Enum. District: 11
Ecclesiastical District:
City/Municipal Borough:
Address: Field's Farm, Betley
County: Staffordshire
Name Relation Condition Sex Age Birth Year Occupation Where Born
BRASSINGTON, Chas Head M 48 1823 Staffordshire
BRASSINGTON, Harriet Wife F 46 1825 Staffordshire
BRASSINGTON, Ann Daughter F 24 1847 Staffordshire<<<<<<<<b Betley
BRASSINGTON, Thomas Son M 20 1851 Staffordshire
BRASSINGTON, Samuel Son M 13 1858 Staffordshire
BRASSINGTON, Sarah Daughter F 11 1860 Staffordshire
BRASSINGTON, Harriet Daughter F 6 1865 Staffordshire
BARRON, Wm Servant M 22 1849 Staffordshire
FOSTER, Saml Servant M 13 1858 Staffordshire
COOPER, Elizth Servant F 27 1844 Cheshire

Betley a couple of miles from Audley

Jean

Jean Report 30 Jun 2013 17:29

No I have done the Chesters all except Ann and I thought that I had found her married to William Lovatt, but it looks as though I am wrong ?. But thanks everyone for your help.

Jean

Christina(Lancashire)

Christina(Lancashire) Report 30 Jun 2013 17:28

Lovatt - Chesters children

Sarah 1871
William 1873
John 1876
Mary 1878
Betsy 1882
James 1888

All registered in Tunstall.

Edited to add James.

MarieCeleste

MarieCeleste Report 30 Jun 2013 17:24

It does Stuart, but it also fetches up the one I posted.

I also cross checked on Staffs BMD

Surname Forename(s) Spouse's Surname Spouse's Forename(s) Year Church / Register Office Registers At Region Reference
LOVATT William BRASSINGTON Ann 1871 Stoke, St Peter Stoke-On-Trent Staffordshire 31/16/132 N/A

LOVATT William CHESTERS Ann 1871 Civil Marriage (Wolstanton) Stoke-On-Trent Staffordshire WRO/14/004

greyghost

greyghost Report 30 Jun 2013 17:23

MC - I too think it's Brassington, but inputting a marriage 1871 of William Lovatt to an Ann brings up those two

Christina(Lancashire)

Christina(Lancashire) Report 30 Jun 2013 17:23

Also, quite a few of their children are on Staffordshire BMD with MMN Brassington.....so if you are looking for Ann Chester, Jean, you are following the wrong family. :-(

MarieCeleste

MarieCeleste Report 30 Jun 2013 17:21

Jean, just to clarify - is it the Chesters you are researching?

If so, then none of the information we've posted on here is relevant as it relates to Ann Brassington and her family - a different William Lovatt.

MarieCeleste

MarieCeleste Report 30 Jun 2013 17:19

Stuart - that's the wrong marriage, I'm sure. I believe it's the one to Ann Brassington that I posted above.

Her cemetary inscription in Connecticut calls her Ann Brassington Lovatt and Arthur's middle name was Brassington.

EDIT:
If it's the Chesters that Jean is researching then it would be the correct marriage but all of the info we've found would be irrelevant.