Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
samuel duxbury born 1870
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Shirley | Report | 30 Jul 2017 11:48 |
hi |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 30 Jul 2017 12:12 |
Have you followed Jane back. Is this her and Samuel in 1871: |
|||
|
Pam | Report | 30 Jul 2017 12:14 |
Nothing under Duxbury or Tattersall on GRO |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 30 Jul 2017 12:18 |
Birth: |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 30 Jul 2017 12:18 |
Marriages Jun 1853 (>99%) |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 30 Jul 2017 12:28 |
Jane's birth listed as Jemings on the GRO: |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 30 Jul 2017 12:32 |
And Sarah's birth: |
|||
|
Eileen | Report | 30 Jul 2017 12:39 |
Samuel Duxbury birth reg Blackburn JAS 1871 8e/447 |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 30 Jul 2017 12:41 |
Eileen- mother's surname for that Samuel is Kelly. Not sure how that fits. If you don't think Samuel Jennings birth that I posted above is correct, could you please explain why? |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 30 Jul 2017 12:43 |
I wonder why she married under the name Tattersall, when the census and mmn for the 1872 birth show her as Jennings?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 30 Jul 2017 12:45 |
Less embarrassment? Better to have a father listed than not? |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 30 Jul 2017 12:50 |
Good point Austin, similar to my grandmother - but she married under her birth name but her stepfather was also listed under that name, rather than his correct name! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 30 Jul 2017 14:37 |
thanks guys, you have been great thanks, think austin is correct, will check more later ,,well done :-) |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 31 Jul 2017 07:46 |
Was looking at below, if her?... |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 31 Jul 2017 08:04 |
Thanks guys yes that is mark who is my connection ...just trying to go round the houses to get info on the duxburys. Great find about the bigamy ..wonder if she really did leave him ..be interesting to see if they were still together on the 1881 census. Oh...no ..tjink I have her on there as a widow and named Duxbury . :-D ;-) |