Find Ancestors

I'm trying to find the marriage of Thomas Cole (sometimes spelled Coal) to Jane ???. Thomas was born in 1792 and he and Jane had four children - Anne, Joseph, Rachel and Ester. Anne was born about 1820 and she's the eldest, so I'm guessing the marriage was within a year or two of that but I can't find anything. Thomas was born in St. Helens, Lancashire, but I've no idea where Jane was born.

Thanks.

Record Transcription:
1841 England, Wales & Scotland Census

Ravenhead Plate Glass Works, Prescot, Lancashire, England

Household Members
Members that resided in the household at the time of the census.
First name(s) Last name Sex Age Birth year Birth place
Thomas Coal Male 48 1793 Lancashire, England
Jane Coal Female 49 1792 Lancashire, England
Rachel Coal Female 13 1828 Lancashire, England
Ester Coal Female 10 1831 Lancashire, England
Joseph Naylor Male 20 1821 Lancashire, England
Ann Naylor Female 20 1821 Lancashire, England

jane already married ????

Thanks safc. That's the correct family but I can't find Thomas and Jane's marriage anywhere.

Record Transcription:
Lancashire Banns & Marriages


Year of birth: 1782
First name(s) Samuel
Last name Naylor
Occupation Plumber & Glazier
Residence Lancaster, St Mary
Year 1818
Marriage year 1818
Marriage date 14 Nov 1818
Denomination Church Of England
Place Lancaster, St Mary
Diocese Blackburn
County Lancashire
Country England
Spouse's first name(s) Jane
Spouse's last name Jones
Spouse's marital status Spinster
Spouse's residence Lancaster, St Mary
Licence or banns Licence
Witness 1 Mary Smith
Witness 2 Ellen Naylor
Witness 3 Henry Harrison
Witness 4 James Naylor
Archive
Lancashire Record Office
Archive reference PR 3262/1/22
Register type Marriages
Register year range 1813-1819
Record set Lancashire Banns & Marriages
Category Birth, Marriage, Death & Parish Records
Subcategory Parish Marriages
Collections from England, Great Britain

????

Baptism: 19 Dec 1819 St Mary, Lancaster, Lancashire, England
Ann Naylor - Daughter of Samuel Naylor & Jane
Born: 6 Nov 1819
Register: Baptisms 1819 - 1824, Page 45, Entry 355
Source: FHL Film 1526146

Thanks, but not the right family. The Joseph Naylor and Ann shown in the 1841 census are my ancestors. Ann is Ann Cole, daughter of Thomas and Jane.

Maybe this one?

Marriage: 24 Feb 1811 St Luke (formerly St Wilfrid), Farnworth (Widnes), Lancashire, England
Thomas Call - (X), Glass manufacturer, Farnworth near Prescot
Jane Cross - (X), Spinster, Farnworth near Prescot
Witness: Mary Pendlebury; Peter Shaw
Married by Banns by: William Thompson - Minister
Notes: [page number out of sequence]
Register: Marriages 1781 - 1812, Page 150, Entry 2033
Source: LDS Film 1655235 item 4

Thomas is living with Elizabeth Cross (Housekeeper) in 1851. Could she be his mother in law?

Children born to the couple before Anne?

Burial: 10 Mar 1812 St Mary the Virgin, Prescot, Lancashire, England
[unnamed] Coal - a dead-born Child of Thomas Coal
Abode: Sutton
Occupation: Labourer
Register: Burials 1810 - 1812, Page 9, Entry 26
Source: LDS Film 1657583

Baptism: 23 May 1813 St Mary the Virgin, Prescot, Lancashire, England
Elizabeth Cole - Daughter of Thomas Cole & Jane
Abode: Sutton
Occupation: Labourer
Baptised by: John Kirby
Register: Baptisms 1813 - 1822, Page 14, Entry 106
Source: LDS Film 1657583

Baptism: 3 Mar 1816 St Mary the Virgin, Prescot, Lancashire, England
James Coal - Son of Thomas Coal & Jane
Abode: Sutton
Occupation: Labourer
Baptised by: CGT Driffield - Vicar
Register: Baptisms 1813 - 1822, Pa

Possible baptism for Jane...

Baptism: 25 Mar 1792 St Mary the Virgin, Prescot, Lancashire, England
Jane Cross - Daur. of James Cross & Elizth.
Born: 29 Feb
Abode: Prescot
Occupation: Watchmr.
Register: Baptisms 1766 - 1809, Page 116, Entry 36
Source: LDS Film 1657583

All the above from lan-opc.org.uk

The marriage image is on Ancestry.

Thanks Christina. It's possible but since their first child (that I can find) was born about 1820 then marriage date seems a bit far out.

Thanks Christina, with the baptisms of the earlier children you've added it now makes more sense. Looks like you might be right about it being Jane Cross.