Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Kelly Births Manchester 1882-1888
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Sylann | Report | 16 Mar 2021 11:50 |
Trying to find which birth certificate to get is their any way of finding out parent |
|||
|
nameslessone | Report | 16 Mar 2021 11:58 |
You have some typos in the first paragraph so it doesn’t make much sense. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 16 Mar 2021 12:11 |
?? Is this the family ?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sylann | Report | 16 Mar 2021 12:16 |
Thank you but I have all the censuses marriages just can't find their birth certificates |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 16 Mar 2021 12:21 |
Yes, I know you have them, but we don't, and as you know, it helps us to be able to see the actual records. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
nameslessone | Report | 16 Mar 2021 12:27 |
There are three possible births for John on Freebmd, although they have second names. Have you checked these out? |
|||
|
nameslessone | Report | 16 Mar 2021 12:43 |
Ancestry give Catherine Fox as a hint. But he could have married Catherine McNally in 1880 or Catherine Davies in 1882 both in Manchester. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 16 Mar 2021 12:50 |
How did you decide that FOX was the woman who gave birth to these three? |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 16 Mar 2021 12:55 |
There must be another thread - FMP alerts me to having accessed the 1891 census previously |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 16 Mar 2021 12:58 |
Birth years on ANY census are only as given - or deduced, based on age. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 16 Mar 2021 13:00 |
I'm not sure if this is the same family as in 1891: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 16 Mar 2021 13:00 |
Catherine is SEVEN in 1891 - so her birth could not possibly have been July 1886, unless her father didn't know how old she was in 1891 |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 16 Mar 2021 13:03 |
I agree that we've looked at this family before. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 16 Mar 2021 13:04 |
I'm gone.......................... |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 16 Mar 2021 13:12 |
This is the one Sylann is assuming is John in 1939: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sylann | Report | 17 Mar 2021 10:02 |
Thank you |