Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

What Happened to Elaine's Thread on the Walbys.

Login to Add Reply Watch This
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!

Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! Report 9 Nov 2007 00:19

I see all of Elaine's threads on Margaret Walby and Mary Hewitson. have been deleted. What was the outcome?

Rose

Researching:
I am not related to you and I'm not your husband's first wife!

GlitterBaby

GlitterBaby Report 9 Nov 2007 00:35

Last I remember was that a possible birth in 1896 had been found for Margaret Walby.

Strange because I had posted the 1901 census that contained Margaret Walby born 1896 on an earlier thread.

So not sure if the Margaret (Maggy) born 1882/3 or the 1896 was the correct one in the end.


Maureen

Researching:
PLEASE DO NOT: send me information concerning your thread on the board as it should be posted on your request where all members can see it. PLEASE DO NOT: ask me for help with lookups as they should be placed on the boards to get the best possible result. PLEASE DO NOT: open your tree just because I have posted information on your thread as I will not be related. THANK YOU. Researching Carter, Cass and Walker in England. Researching Caven, McKill, Sutherland and Will in Scotland.

Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!

Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! Report 9 Nov 2007 00:42

Thanks Maureen,

I replied that Margaret would have been a bit too young to have had Mary in 1910 and that was the last I saw.

Rose

Researching:
I am not related to you and I'm not your husband's first wife!