Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1891 please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Little Lost | Report | 20 Nov 2007 18:09 |
looking for the family of Sarah Anne FREED c 1884 London please. |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 20 Nov 2007 18:11 |
No births registered in that name from 1882 to 1886 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 20 Nov 2007 18:13 |
Could she be plain Sarah |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 20 Nov 2007 18:14 |
Births Jun 1886 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Little Lost | Report | 20 Nov 2007 18:16 |
Thank you |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 20 Nov 2007 18:19 |
Marriages Sep 1908 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 20 Nov 2007 18:21 |
1901 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Little Lost | Report | 20 Nov 2007 20:26 |
Thank you , I dont suppose you could find Frederick freed on 1871 please. Found him on 1881. born about 1854 Maidstone. |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 20 Nov 2007 23:20 |
1871 a poss especially as there is a Rose as a sister which matches the 1881 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Little Lost | Report | 21 Nov 2007 04:55 |
Thank you GLitter Baby ( a nice christmassy name) lol |
|||
|
Little Lost | Report | 21 Nov 2007 05:03 |
well just been checking and I think the one you found in 1841 mis-spelt as Fredd is one of my direct line. If you have the image could you check to see if the one that says Thomas aged 17 is in fact Amos age 7 ???? could easily have been mistranscribed. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 21 Nov 2007 05:20 |
Hi Gloria |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Little Lost | Report | 21 Nov 2007 07:45 |
Thank you Sylvia |