Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Findmypast DNA Banner

New posts
No new posts
Thread closed
Stickied, new posts
Stickied, no new posts

Login to Add Reply Watch This

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: January 2006 Posts: 93 Send Message	Sarah	Report	7 Dec 2007 21:27
Member Since: January 2006 Posts: 93 Send Message	Thanks everyone for your help, it is much appreciated. Sarah
Member Since: January 2006 Posts: 93 Send Message	Sarah	Report	7 Dec 2007 21:22
Member Since: January 2006 Posts: 93 Send Message	Hi Keith You are thinking along the same lines as me. It's a mystery isn't it? Sarah
Member Since: January 2006 Posts: 93 Send Message	Sarah	Report	7 Dec 2007 21:20
Member Since: January 2006 Posts: 93 Send Message	Hi all I think you are right Elouise as I have had my suspicians that Sarah had the middle name Hannah because I found like Keith, that the Sarah H in 1871 is 'my' Sarah and did marry William wiltshire. Tom was living with them in 1871 because he had married Sarah Tudor in 1870, they had their first child James and then Sarah 'dissapears' before the 1871 census is taken. I thought that she must have died in childbirth or thereabouts , but there is no sign of a death for her.That is another mystery for me to solve. Do you think that she could have left Tom and the baby or is there some other reason that I can't find her death? Thanks Sarah
Member Since: March 2006 Posts: 1,594 Send Message	imp	Report	7 Dec 2007 21:14
Member Since: March 2006 Posts: 1,594 Send Message	William Wiltshire marriage, 1864, Q3, Birmingham, 6d 83, also Hannah Nutt, 6d 83. Gail.
Member Since: April 2006 Posts: 5,644 Send Message	KeithInFujairah	Report	7 Dec 2007 21:07
Member Since: April 2006 Posts: 5,644 Send Message	Thomas's marriage? Name: Tom Nutt Year of Registration: 1870 Quarter of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar District: Birmingham (1837-1924) County: Warwickshire Volume: 6d Page: 76 On same page Mary Price or Sarah Tudor. Unfortunately cannot see a death for a Mary or Sarah Nutt to tie in with the marriage and possible death in childbirth.
Member Since: March 2006 Posts: 1,594 Send Message	imp	Report	7 Dec 2007 21:02
Member Since: March 2006 Posts: 1,594 Send Message	1871 Tom Nutt Age: 22 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1849 Relation: Lodger Where born: Birmingham, Warwickshire, England Civil Parish: Aston Ecclesiastical parish: St Clement Town: Duddeston Cum Nechells County/Island: Warwickshire Registration district: Aston Sub-registration district: Duddeston James Nutt 7 months Tom Nutt 22 Widow? Waggonner Jane E Wiltshire 4 Mary A Wiltshire 7 months Sarah H Wiltshire 30 Sarah H Wiltshire 6 William Wiltshire 25 William H Wiltshire 2 Source Citation: Class: RG10; Piece: 3152; Folio: 89; Page: 3; GSU roll: 839234. Did Sarah marry a Wiltshire? Gail.
Member Since: April 2006 Posts: 5,644 Send Message	KeithInFujairah	Report	7 Dec 2007 20:58
Member Since: April 2006 Posts: 5,644 Send Message	On the 1861 Elouise found above, Thomas 1816 is a railway labourer, on the 1851, Tom snr is a railway porter, both children shown as born Birmingham on 1861. Also found this, so suspect Sarah/Hannah are one and the same. Name: Sarahh Hannah Nutt Year of Registration: 1843 Quarter of Registration: Apr-May-Jun District: Warwick (To 1932) County: Warwickshire Volume: 16 Page: 524
Member Since: January 2006 Posts: 93 Send Message	Sarah	Report	7 Dec 2007 20:54
Member Since: January 2006 Posts: 93 Send Message	Hi Elouise This does look like them. I have been having problems trying to trace this family in 1861 ( probably because Tom's age was transcribed wrongly at the time )but it looks like you have found them. Thank you very much, I appreciate you taking time to do this look up for me. Best wishes Sarah
Member Since: January 2006 Posts: 93 Send Message	Sarah	Report	7 Dec 2007 20:36
Member Since: January 2006 Posts: 93 Send Message	Please could someone kindly look up my 3x Gt Grandparents Thomas and Sarah Nutt on the 1861 census for Birmingham. According to the 1851 census for Aston, Birmingham ,Thomas was born about 1812 Banbury Oxfordshire and Sarah was born about 1810 Fenny Compton Warwickshire. They had a daughter Sarah born about 1843 Leamington and a son Tom ( my 2x Gt Grandfather )born 1849 Birmingham. I don't know if they had any other children but I am hoping the 1861 census will tell me. many thanks Sarah

All site material is owned by Findmypast Limited and should not be used without prior permission.

Any views expressed in message boards and members notes represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the opinions of Findmypast Limited.

© Copyright 2024 Findmypast Limited.