Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
HELP...I think I need specsavers or something.....
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Margaret | Report | 19 Dec 2007 14:42 |
because I am trying to find Thomas Scott b abt 1849, wife Mary b abt 1946 on the census returns going back from 1891. I have them on there but cannot find them before that. I want to establish if they had any other children other than those shown on the 1891 census and also to track back from Thomas 1849 in the hoipe of finding his siblings and parents. Would anyone care to have a look for me as I've spent ages. According to 1891 census, Thomas, his wife Mary and all children were born Coventry, Warwickshire, although up until now I have also been unable to find the marriage of Thomas Scott and Mary A ? on Freebmd in Coventry. Thanks a lot |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 19 Dec 2007 14:53 |
Yes eloise, that's them. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 19 Dec 2007 15:26 |
Would anyone else be willing to have a go please - it just doesn't make sense that they can't ne found beyond 1891 really, they must be somewhere !! Help somebody !!! |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 19 Dec 2007 15:55 |
Hi Margaret |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 19 Dec 2007 15:59 |
Many thanks Vera. This is beyond understanding isn't it. I could understand perhaps being missing from one census, but not all of them bar 1891. The invisible family... |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 19 Dec 2007 16:14 |
Hi Margaret |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 19 Dec 2007 16:18 |
You gem Vera - no I hadn't got this. The only one I had was the 1891 which said Coventry as birthplace. I was led to believe they were a Coventry family but according to that Thomas was born Walsall !! This might change things and perhaps Walsall/Staffordshire is the area to pursue for 1881 and backwards. Would the address in 1901 be Trafalgar Street, Coventry by any chance. You are a wonder. Thank you. |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 19 Dec 2007 16:18 |
Hi Margaret |
|||
|
Bluesavannah | Report | 19 Dec 2007 16:20 |
This looks good for 1871 |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 19 Dec 2007 16:21 |
Hi again |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 19 Dec 2007 16:23 |
Hi Margaret |
|||
|
***Rose Tea*** | Report | 19 Dec 2007 16:30 |
possible marraige 1871 walsall 6b 673 march quarter |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 19 Dec 2007 16:42 |
Vera - you are wonderful and I am truly grateful. Just popped off to prepare the veg for tea and when I come back - bingo, you have cracked it. You've made my day. Many thanks. |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 19 Dec 2007 16:44 |
Hi Margaret |
|||
|
covlass | Report | 29 Dec 2007 09:00 |
Margaret |
|||
Researching: |