Find Ancestors

William Naisbitt (various spelling) b.1830 in Ferryhill. I think i may have found his father George b.1806 in Lanchester and his mother and siblings. I have them in each census all living near each other in the same civil parishes. Since it is before certificates and as yet i cant view the parish records can anyone help me determine that William is George's son. Thanks Alison

Did William marry?

If he did, the cert will tell you the name and occupation of his father...........

Reg

Yes William did marry before 1851 but i cant find his marriage. His wife in 1851 is down as Mary Burnup Naisbitt and living with George (the possible father) is a Joseph Burnup. But cant find a marriage for Naisbitt to Burnup. I will follow that up though thanks Reg.

Elouise - I will try and find them in census. they could be possible uncles or turn out to be the father! Thanks!

Hi Alison if it is George the father poss christening below in Lanchester and lists parents of George:

IGI Individual Record FamilySearch™ International Genealogical Index v5.0
British Isles


GEORGE NAIZBET OR USHAW Pedigree
Male

Event(s):
Birth: 01 FEB 1808

Christening: 11 SEP 1808 Lanchester, Durham, England

Parents:
Father: WILLIAM NAIZBET Family
Mother: MARGARET USHAW


Michelle

Thanks. If he is then that could be his parents. I do hope so!

If right father(George)this looks like his brother-same parents:




IGI Individual Record FamilySearch™ International Genealogical Index v5.0
British Isles
Search Results | Download


WILLIAM NAISBETT OR USHEA Pedigree
Male
Event(s):
Birth: 15 APR 1805

Christening: 11 AUG 1805 Lanchester, Durham, England

Parents:
Father: WILLIAM NAISBETT Family
Mother: MARGARET USHEA

Sorry I made it confusing!
I think George may be Williams father.
William & wife Mary Burnup Naisbitt are living in 1851.
1851 census George (possible father) is living with a Joseph Burnup - so it links but can't find a marriage.
And i cant determine whether William is Georges son. Sorry!

thanks Michelle. I hope this all fits! they're a confusing family . so many variations!

1851

George Naisbett
Age: 42
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1809
Relation: Head
Spouse's Name: Elizabeth
Gender: Male
Where born: Lanchester, Durham, England

Civil Parish: Newfield
Ecclesiastical parish: Byers Green
County/Island: Durham
Country: England

Registration district: Auckland
Sub-registration district: Bishop Auckland
ED, institution, or vessel: 6
Neighbors: View others on page
Household schedule number: 36
Household Members: Name Age
Joseph Burnup 40 lodger
Elizabeth Naisbett 51
Elizabeth Naisbett 2
George Naisbett 42
George Naisbett 11
Joseph Naisbett 7
Margarett Naisbett 13
Sarah Naisbett 19
Thomas Naisbett 16


Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece: 2385; Folio: 73; Page: 16; GSU roll: 87063.


Same family in 1841? I think image says Neasby

living Byers Green

William Neashy
Age: 12
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1829
Gender: Male
Where born: Durham, England

Civil Parish: St Andrew Auckland
Hundred: Darlington (North West Division)
County/Island: Durham
Country: England

Registration district: Auckland
Sub-registration district: Bishop Auckland
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members: Name Age
Elizabeth Neashy 30
Geo Neashy 30 plate layer
George Neashy 1
Margaret Neashy 3
Sarah Neashy 9
Thomas Neashy 7
William Neashy 12


Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece 303; Book: 1; Civil Parish: St Andrew Auckland; County: Durham; Enumeration District: 10; Folio: 10; Page: 14; Line: 10; GSU roll: 241350.


Andy

Oh thanks Andy I was trying to find them in 1841. and all the names seem to fit. This post is helping! Thanks again.

Ohh that all fits.. Maybe Joseph decided he would go under ''Burnop'' in the 1851 census. Meaning it would still tie in. Thanks Libby

How did you find that Libby?

and how did you find the igi? :)

Thanks Libby I will follow all of them up and hopefully get an answer. Now i know George Naisbitts occupation could i order William and Marys marriage? which then would tell me his fathers name which i could then try and prove right?

Thanks again!!
I hope this is all correct because you have found so much!