Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Married to each other twice in 2 years
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
ElizabethK | Report | 6 Jun 2008 13:09 |
I have one of these as well! |
|||
|
Brett | Report | 5 Jun 2008 21:46 |
Thanks everybody for your ideas. I like the one about losing 1st cert. and having to produce it to get Army benefits. Also he may not have had permission to marry the 1st time. Father's details same on both certs. Witnesses at 1st. wedding in Canterbury are his father, brother and either her mother or sister. Married by Assistant Curate. "nd wedding in Reg Office states still bachelor/spinster, witnesses Curtis/Lowford mean nothing to me-yet.#Thanks once again |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 5 Jun 2008 08:56 |
Not sure about rules then but I do know of men in the Army in 1970s who had to ask their C.O. for permission to marry. |
|||
|
Thistledown | Report | 5 Jun 2008 00:34 |
|
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 4 Jun 2008 23:23 |
You see this a lot for soldiers. They had to produce a marriage certficate so the wife could be entitled to accomodation and other army benefits. Perhaps they lost the first cert. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kay???? | Report | 4 Jun 2008 22:58 |
was there anything in wording or ages between the 2 certificates,, assume they both carry the same fathers in each case, |
|||
|
KempinaPartyhat | Report | 4 Jun 2008 22:18 |
Prehaps the church is not accepted in the romany culture ... |
|||
|
Brett | Report | 4 Jun 2008 22:09 |
Hi, does anyone know why my Gt Grandparents would have been married 4.7.1907 in his home church, Canterbury, Kent then again 24.8.1908 at her home Registry office in Sth Stoneham, Hants? He was a soldier and she came from a romany family that had settled in the Southampton area in mid 1800's. I have both marriage certs. Any ideas? |
|||
Researching: |