Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Reasons for an inquest 1869?

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Battenburg

Battenburg Report 8 Jun 2008 01:36



I have a death cert which gives the time of death 1 am. The deputy coroner was the informant. Im assuming he died from a heart attack by the old name which is difficult to read.Ducuptio Arterla? or something like it.

Cant find anything on this in old diseases. There was a coroners inquest but as has been said few inquest reports survive

robertpplane

robertpplane Report 7 Jun 2008 23:11

Even today, inquests are normally held only where the death is unexpected or where there is cause to suspect that the death was due to unnatural causes, Doctors and Officers of the Court (police officers, solicitors, barristers, judges) have the right to request an inquest, based upon reasonable grounds.

Members of the public, ie the rest of us, have the right to request a judicial review, following which a judge can pronounce either way.

Heather

Heather Report 7 Jun 2008 22:52

Chris, look a long way ahead for the marriage. Ive found marriages decades after kids were born - in one case I know it was because the first husband was still alive and shacked up with a housekeeper. They must have heard about his death and then got married though in their 60s!

Just realised that guy was only 23 when he died - oh dear, no wonder they had an inquest then.

MaryfromItaly

MaryfromItaly Report 7 Jun 2008 19:53

No, it was normal to remarry. But maybe the other man wasn't free?

Chris from salop

Chris from salop Report 7 Jun 2008 19:38

Thankyou joan and janet.When i visit shrewsbury next i will go to the records office and see if i can find out more . Without more info i cant be sure i have the right man.Another brick wall!!
My GG grandmother appears on 1871 census with a new man and goes on to have 6 children with him leaving the child from her first marriage with his grandparents.
I have never found her marriage to this other chap but surely if her first husband had died it wouldn't have been shameful to re marry?
chris

Janet 693215

Janet 693215 Report 7 Jun 2008 19:27

He was probably showing no signs of ill health before his death so a post mortem would have been needed to find the reason for his death. Perhaps there was some doubt as to what had caused the heart disease and an inquest was decided upon to ensure that there was no evidence of foul play.

You could also look for reports of the inquest in the local paper.

Chris from salop

Chris from salop Report 7 Jun 2008 19:02

Hi Everyone,Have received a death cert today for who i think is my gg grandmothers first husband. He died in 1869 age 23 ,cause of death "Disease of the heart" Unfortunately the informant was the coroner of shrewsbury not a family member as i had hoped.I was curious why a inquest would have been held as i thought this was only the case if death was due to an accident. Any thoughts?Would i need to see a copy of the inquest to find out more to proove if i have the right chap.?
Thanks
chris