Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Help
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ericthered | Report | 14 Jan 2009 17:52 |
|
I presume this is the birth.....................17 years too late for 1911 census |
|||
|
Irene | Report | 14 Jan 2009 17:51 |
|
No deaths showing forher as far as 1930. Irene |
|||
|
Ericthered | Report | 14 Jan 2009 17:50 |
|
If she is 73 NOW......she wouldn't have been born until 1935. |
|||
|
Sallyann | Report | 14 Jan 2009 17:48 |
|
no sorry shes 73 now, i have tried it with no e and no middle name also :( |
|||
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!) | Report | 14 Jan 2009 17:31 |
|
You mean she would have been 73 in 1911? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sallyann | Report | 14 Jan 2009 17:29 |
|
i am not sure if i am doing something wrong but i cant seem to find a tree member on the 1911 census - i am ooking for Noreen Beryl Cooke shes roughly 73 now please can some one point me in the right direction. |
|||