Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

curtis/munday

Login to Add Reply Watch This
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Susan

Susan Report 28 Nov 2009 18:54

thanks for yr help everyone i will follow up from the new info you have given me regards sue

Madmeg

Madmeg Report 24 Nov 2009 19:36

As usual, I am not quite with it.

Your g grandfather was Walter Daniel Curtis, his mother was Ellen Dungey and father presumably Ebeneezer Curtis. Is that right?

So what happened to Walter Daniel and Ebeneezer? Did Ebeneezer die and Ellen "remarried" James Munday?

patchem

patchem Report 23 Nov 2009 21:04

If this is James in 1881, he claims to be unmarried, so - she dies, he abandons the children?

1881 England Census
James Monday Age: 49 Estimated birth year: abt 1832
Relation: Head Gender: Male Where born: Biddenden, Kent, England Civil parish: Newington in Milton County/Island: Kent Country: England Street Address: London Road
Occupation: Agr Lab Registration district: Milton Sub-registration district: Milton ED, institution, or vessel: 22
James Monday 49
Source Citation: Class: RG11; Piece: 974; Folio: 59; Page: 12;GSU roll: 1341231.

Pat

patchem

patchem Report 23 Nov 2009 20:37

Have you followed up all the 'workhouse children' to see what happens to them, and whether a 'grandmother' later turns up staying with them?

Pat

brummiejan

brummiejan Report 23 Nov 2009 18:38

Maybe she and James never married? He could have abandoned her I suppose. Strange that they have reverted to her name though, if registered as Munday.
Jan

Researching:
Myatt, Hanks, Eccleston, Powell, Clungunford, Birmingham

Susan

Susan Report 23 Nov 2009 17:16

i cant find a death for james munday either so why have all these kids ended up in the workhouse and theyve all reverted back to curtis even though their munday on their birth cert ?

brummiejan

brummiejan Report 23 Nov 2009 16:59

I see what you mean - she must have married James as you say:

1871 England Census

Name: Ellen Monday
Age: 34
Estimated birth year: abt 1837
Relation: Wife
Spouse's name: James
Gender: Female
Where born: Cranbrook, Kent, England
Civil parish: Newington
Town: Newington
County/Island: Kent
Country: England
Registration district: Milton
Sub-registration district: Milton

Name Age
James Monday 38
Ellen Monday 34
Sarah Monday 12
John H Monday 11
George Monday 9
Rosa Monday 7
William Monday 5
Ellen Monday 4
Phoeby Monday 2
Edwin Monday 6 weeks

Researching:
Myatt, Hanks, Eccleston, Powell, Clungunford, Birmingham

Susan

Susan Report 23 Nov 2009 16:54

thanks guys, she cant have just vanished into thin air between 1871 and 1881 and i have searched the deaths to no avail

brummiejan

brummiejan Report 23 Nov 2009 16:46

As there are 2 Ellens I would get her marriage cert to ascertain father's name:

Marriages Sep 1852 (>99%)
Curtis Ebenezer Cranbrook 2a 656
DUNGEY Ellen Cranbrook 2a 656

Jan

Researching:
Myatt, Hanks, Eccleston, Powell, Clungunford, Birmingham

Sue

Sue Report 23 Nov 2009 16:29

Hi Susan
I don't know if this helps, but an Ellen Curtis married in Milton 1873. If you're not sure if she became a Monday, could this be her?
Regards Sue

Susan

Susan Report 23 Nov 2009 15:36

no im afraid i dont know her fathers name as i havnt gone that far back yet, its just i cant find her after 1871 and want to know why her kids are all in the workhouse

brummiejan

brummiejan Report 23 Nov 2009 15:32

Bizarrely there seem to be 2 Ellens (in 1851 too - be careful you might have the wrong one):

1841 England Census

Name: Ellen Dungey
Age: 4
Estimated birth year: abt 1837
Gender: Female
Where born: Kent, England

Civil parish: Cranbrooke
Hundred: Cranbrooke
County/Island: Kent

Registration district: Cranbrook
Sub-registration district: Cranbrook

Charles Dungey 25
Martha Dungey 25
Ellen Dungey 4
Jane Dungey 2
George Dungey 3 Mo



1841 England Census

Name: Ellen Dungey
Age: 4
Estimated birth year: abt 1837
Gender: Female
Where born: Kent, England

Civil parish: Cranbrooke
Hundred: Cranbrooke
County/Island: Kent

Registration district: Cranbrook
Sub-registration district: Cranbrook

Ann Dungey 50
George Dungey 25
Charles Dungey 20
Thomas Dungey 15
Sarah Dungey 13
Henry Dungey 5
Ellen Dungey 4


Do you have her father's name from marriage cert?

Jan

Researching:
Myatt, Hanks, Eccleston, Powell, Clungunford, Birmingham

brummiejan

brummiejan Report 23 Nov 2009 15:28

First things first, her birth:

Births Sep 1837
DUNGEY Ellen Cranbrook 5 58

Jan

Researching:
Myatt, Hanks, Eccleston, Powell, Clungunford, Birmingham

Susan

Susan Report 23 Nov 2009 15:16

hi guys, you all helped me out a couple of months ago regarding my gt gfather walter daniel curtis and found him for me.
I cannot find what happened to his mother.

she was originally Ellen Dungey ( born cranbrrok 1837c)and married ebeneezer curtis sep 1852 cranbrook
on the 1861 cencus she is listed as housekeeper to james munday.on 1871 census she is listed as spouse to james monday in newington kent and then i cannot find her anymore.Any tips on where to look.I have tried deaths but to be quite honest i dont know if she really became a munday officially .and her children are later found in the milton union workhouse in 1881. any help would be greatly appreciated
thanking you in anticipation sue