The Correct father?

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: February 2007 Posts: 786 Send Message	Helen in Bucks	Report	18 Dec 2009 13:38
	also, remember that baptisms didn't necessarily happen when the person was a baby, sometimes families baptised the whole family together with older children being up to 12 or so, sometimes people only got baptised when they came to be married
Member Since: July 2004 Posts: 211 Send Message	margaret	Report	18 Dec 2009 12:40
	I have a marriage in 1794 , and the death of the groom in 1812, neither parish register entries gives his age. There are two possible 'fathers' for this man, in that there is a baptism in 1765 and one in 1775 -both in the same parish register. The earlier one would make him 19, at the marriage, the latter 29. As he was a cordwainer at his marriage, is he more likely to be the man aged 29. AND how do I prove this?
	Researching: MASSEY in Cheshire, UK / ADDERLEY in Staffs & Cheshire/ BRUSHETT in Portsmouth