Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

1901 census help please sorted thank you jonesey &

Login to Add Reply Watch This
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

michael2

michael2 Report 25 Mar 2010 10:26

could some one please help i have found on the 1901 mabel e fuggleborn circa 1895, paddock wood kent. it says father william i fuggle , but he or spouse are on census, just the children. please can any body make any sense of this.

Julie

Julie Report 25 Mar 2010 10:29

If you click on to see the image then you'll see their parents

Father..William 32 Railway watchman...born in Paddock Wood
Mother Rosa 33

William Fuggle
Age: 32
Estimated birth year: abt 1869
Relation: Head
Spouse's name: Rose M
Gender: Male
Where born: Paddock Wood, Kent, England
Civil parish: Brenchley
Ecclesiastical parish: Paddock Wood
Town: Paddock Wood
County/Island: Kent
Country: England
Street Address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage:

Education:

Employment status:

View image
Registration district: Tonbridge
Sub-registration district: Brenchley
ED, institution, or vessel: 6
Neighbors: View others on page
Household schedule number: 125
Household Members:
Name Age
William Fuggle 32
Rose M Fuggle 33....Queens Street, Kent, England

michael2

michael2 Report 25 Mar 2010 10:32

hi jonesey thats the one surley he should be on the census as the children appear to be on their own with only a lodger who is of full age?

Julie

Julie Report 25 Mar 2010 10:34

Jonesey

The John Fuggle you had put is in the household before

michael2

michael2 Report 25 Mar 2010 10:43

hi jonesey and julie thank you very much for the information you got for me . michael