Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Can't find them on the Cenus!

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Janette

Janette Report 17 Oct 2010 16:39

Hi, sorry about the late reply. It has taken me a little time to piece this together and WOW! This is great! Thank you ever EVER so much all for your help.

Janette xxx

Ozibird

Ozibird Report 15 Oct 2010 21:29

Possibly James and Elizabeth are the right ones to follow.

1881 England Census
Name: James Liddle
Age: 20
Estimated birth year: abt 1861
Relation: Son in Law
Spouse's name: Elizabeth Liddle
Gender: Male
Where born: Spennymoor, Durham, England <<<<<<<<<<<<
Civil parish: Collierley
County/Island: Durham
Country: England
Street Address: Dowlais Cottages
Condition as to marriage: Married

Occupation: Coal Miner
Registration district: Lanchester
Sub-registration district: Tanfield
Household Members: Name Age
Robert Newton 39
Susan Newton 42
Robert Newton 16
Elizabeth Liddle 20
James Liddle 20

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 15 Oct 2010 21:26

and Robert's death

Deaths Dec 1894 (>99%)

Reather Robert 50 Lanchester 10a 185




sylvia

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 15 Oct 2010 21:25

from freebmd


Marriages Mar 1884 (>99%)

Hopper Andrew Lanchester 10a 359
Moses William Auckland 10a 359
>>>>REATHER Robert Lanchester 10a 359
ROSSITER George S.Shields 10a 359
>>>>Salkeld Mary Jane Lanchester 10a 359
Turley Martha Lanchester 10a 359





sylvia

MaureeninNY

MaureeninNY Report 15 Oct 2010 21:25

So..
Marriages Mar 1884 (>99%)
REATHER Robert Lanchester 10a 359
Salkeld Mary Jane Lanchester 10a 359

Maureen

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 15 Oct 2010 21:21

Name Age
James Siddle 28 b.ca 1863, Spenry Moor, Durham, Married, Coal Miner
Andrew Siddle 5 b.ca 1886, Gateshead, Durham
James Siddle 3 b.ca 1888, Gateshead
Walter Siddle 1 b.ca 1890, Wallsend, Northumberland
Mary I Reather 26 b.ca 1865, Greenside, Durham, Married, General Servant
John I Salkeld 8 b.ca 1883, Conselt, Durham, Lodger

Address:- 1 to 2 Lyne Street


It could be Mary J and John J, rather than I as the middle initial



sylvia

Choccy

Choccy Report 15 Oct 2010 21:20



1911

LIDDLE, Mary Jane Head Married F 47 1864 Greenside Northumberland VIEW
LIDDLE, James Son Single M 23 1888 Coal Miner Hewer Coxhoe Northumberland VIEW
LIDDLE, Lance Emery Son Single M 19 1892 Coal Miner Rope Way Hand Walker Northumberland VIEW
LIDDLE, William Son Single M 18 1893 Coal Miner Pony Putter Walker Northumberland VIEW
LIDDLE, Ethel Daughter Single F 16 1895 Birtley Co Durham VIEW
LIDDLE, Jacob Wilson Son M 13 1898 School Portobello Birtley Co Durham VIEW
LIDDLE, Ralph Son M 11 1900 School Stanley Co Durham VIEW
LIDDLE, Frederick Son M 8 1903 Stanley Co Durham VIEW
LIDDLE, Robert Son M 7 1904 Stanley Co Durham VIEW

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RG number:
RG14 Piece:
29853 Reference:
RG14PN29853 RG78PN1729 RD550 SD1 ED2 SN103

Registration District:
Lanchester Sub District:
Tanfield Enumeration District:
2 Parish:
Stanley

Address:
2 Duncombe Terrace Stanley S O County:
Durham

doesn't say how long married - 9 children born, 9 still living

Ozibird

Ozibird Report 15 Oct 2010 21:18

Especially when you see this.

Births Jun 1891
Liddle Lance Emery Tynemouth 10b 276

1911: LIDDLE LANCE EMERY M 1892 19 Lanchester Durham

Looks like the Liddle/Reather marriage could be the right one.

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 15 Oct 2010 21:15

wow!

Maureen


you've cracked it methinks!!!




sylvia

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 15 Oct 2010 21:14

BTW

the James with wife Elizabeth in 1881 is a coal miner



sylvia

MaureeninNY

MaureeninNY Report 15 Oct 2010 21:11

1891 Ancestry
Name: Walter Siddle
Age: 1
Estimated birth year: abt 1890
Relation: Son
Father's Name: James Siddle
Gender: Male
Where born: Wallsend, Northumberland, England
Civil parish: Longbenton
Ecclesiastical parish: Christ Church Walker
Town: Walker
County/Island: Northumberland
Country: England
Registration district: Tynemouth
Sub-registration district: Longbenton
ED, institution, or vessel: 1
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members:
Name Age
James Siddle 28
Andrew Siddle 5
James Siddle 3
Walter Siddle 1
Mary I Reather 26
John I Salkeld 8
Source Citation: Class: RG12; Piece: 4231; Folio 30; Page 54

Maureen

Ozibird

Ozibird Report 15 Oct 2010 21:06

What does 1911 say because there is this one as well.

Marriages Dec 1899
Liddle James Lanchester 10a 551 <<<<<
McCreesh James Lanchester 10a 551
Mulholland Mary Ann Lanchester 10a 551
Reather Mary Jane Lanchester 10a 551 <<<<<

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 15 Oct 2010 20:55

oh dear

one almost wants to weep!


I can't find any sign of the Liddles before 1901, not at least with any certainty.

I have found a marriage registration which MAY be correct

Marriages Mar 1880 (>99%)

Bell Mary Jane Weardale 10a 293
Liddle James Weardale 10a 293

In desperation, I looked at the Public Family Trees on ancestry to see if I could get a clue ........... I'm thinking in terms of a terrible mis-transcription or even a listing under the wrong surname.

One tree has 5 attached records, 6 sources, umpteen photos ............... parents James and Mary Jane, all the children shown on the 1901 Census


BUT then you get into looking more deeply.


1891 ............ she/he has James living at home with mother and unmarried .......... mother called Mary aged 70. All quite correct, there is a census entry .............. BUT not your James

1881 .............. s/he has James living with inlaws ......... but his wife is called Elizabeth!

She has wife's name as Mary Jane Salkeld ........ but no note of when they might have married!

none of the children's records show them being found in 1891



I do hope no-one copies that tree!!!!!




Meanwhile ............ I think the Liddle family have taken off in that alien spaceship!!!


The one that deposited my gt x ??? grandfather in Buckinghamshire in 1720





sylvia

Janette

Janette Report 15 Oct 2010 20:17

Yes, that is the family on the 1901 Census :)

GlitterBaby

GlitterBaby Report 15 Oct 2010 20:15

1901 is this the correct family?

Name: James Liddle
Age: 39
Estimated birth year: abt 1862
Relation: Head
Spouse's name: Mary J Liddle
Gender: Male
Where born: Spennymoor, Durham, England

Civil parish: Stanley
Ecclesiastical parish: Beamish St Andrew
Town: Stanley
County/Island: Durham
Country: England

Street Address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage:

Education:

Employment status: View image

Registration district: Lanchester
Sub-registration district: Tanfield
ED, institution, or vessel: 7
Neighbors: View others on page
Household schedule number: 109
Household Members: Name Age
James Liddle 39
Mary J Liddle 38
John J Liddle 18
Andrew Liddle 15
James Liddle 13
Walter Liddle 11
Lance Liddle 9
William Liddle 7
Ethel Liddle 5
Jacob W Liddle 3
Ralph Liddle 1

Janette

Janette Report 15 Oct 2010 20:11

Hi, having found the family on the 1901 cenus, i went on to look for them on the 1891 cenus but to no avail and was wondering if another pair of eyes would help!

The family is of James Liddle born 1862 Durham and Mary Liddle born 1863 Durham. They were living in Lachester in 1901.

Thanks again Janette :)