Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Old Baptism meaning?

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

poppycat

poppycat Report 13 Jan 2011 02:13

I have come across Baptisms for 1700's & shows a baby boy born showing his name 'John'.
Next column shows.....bbs.....name of mother......Surname

If a girl shows......bbd......mame of Mother or Father

What does ...bbs & bbd Mean?

mgnv

mgnv Report 13 Jan 2011 02:31

Never seen this - my guess is base born son/daur, i.e., illegitimate.

poppycat

poppycat Report 13 Jan 2011 02:56

mgnv

Thanks for your guess work on this & may well be correct have a look for yourself from this site & let me know what you think..................................................................................

...chardstockwebmuseum org

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 13 Jan 2011 04:13

That's a bit of a vague direction to follow. ;)

google google:

bbs base born son

finds

http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/SOM/Carhampton/BapCar_1813.html

The Rel field contains one of four values :
* s - Son
* d - Daughter
* bbs - Base Born Son (illegitimate)
* bbd - Base Born Daughter (illegitimate)


Yay, mgnv. (It was my thought too. ;) )

poppycat

poppycat Report 13 Jan 2011 04:48



JaneyCanuck ...................Thanks for your input as well there's always something new to learn!

mgnv

mgnv Report 13 Jan 2011 10:14

Looking at, say, http://chardstockwebmuseum.org/Chardstock%20Baptisms%20to%201911.pdf it's clear it's a transcribers' abbreviation. Also, it's the transcribers' categorization -it's unlikely that 400+ years of vicars would all choose the same wording.
The actual records probably say things like:
John Smith, an unmarried man and Jane Green an unmarried woman had a son..
John Smith man and Jane Green had a natural son..
John Smith and Jane Green had a son (procreate in fornication)..
etc.