Genealogy Chat

Hi Hayley

Then the birth registration posted earlier for Florence Gladys Barron in the March quarter of 1908 in Edmonton would be the one for your grandmother.

Although she was born in December 1907 her parents would have had 6 weeks to register the birth so would have legally had to have done so by the end of January 1908 - this would bring the registration record into the March quarter of 1908.

Thankyou Glitter baby.I know a lot of this information has been given but a match links in another family tree but she only had 2 of those children in hers.
Any mistakes make for a long line of mistakes so i needed to double check.

Thankyou Cherryblossom, my Nans name was indeed Florence Gladys Barron. She was born 14 December 1907.

Thankyou for your help. x

There is a tree on Ancestry that has the Elsie Amy Barron born 1897 from the 1911 census listed as Constance Elsie Barron.

For reference, the thread from yesterday

http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards.page/board/trying_to_find/thread/1256347

Thank you Glitterbaby

A lot of this info has already been given

Surname First name(s) District Vol Page
Marriages Dec 1895 (>99%)
>>>Barron David Alfred Edmonton 3a 435
Burling Eliza Jane Edmonton 3a 435
Lorn Henry Edward Edmonton 3a 435
>>>Nott Emily Emma Edmonton 3a 435

From www.freebmd.org.uk


Well, I think Jesie Amy from the 1911 should be Elsie Amy

Births Mar 1897
Barron Elsie Amy Edmonton 3a 465

Births Sep 1898
Barron Alfred George Edmonton 3a 471

Births Dec 1900
Barron John William Edmonton 3a 495

Births Mar 1903
Barron Emily Annie Edmonton 3a 587


Births Mar 1908
Barron Florence Gladys Edmonton 3a 645

Births Mar 1910
BARRON Daisy Frances Edmonton 3a 607



Obviously, with a five year gap between 1903 and 1908 there could have been a couple more children born in those years.

Plus this one after 1911

Births Sep 1912
Barron Frederick F Nott Edmonton 3a 1248


What was your Gran's name, when was she born?

Have you found their marriage on Freebmd?
Katie

I think the 1911 census should be correct - it was filled out by the family. Have you found them on the earlier censuses? Some children could have been born before the marriage.
Katie

Here are your family in 1911

BARRON, Alfred David Head Married M 41 1870 Warehouseman Braughing Herts
BARRON, Emily Emma Wife Married 15 years F 41 1870 Edmonton Middlesex
BARRON, Jesie Amy Daughter F 14 1897 Edmonton Mdsex
BARRON, Alfred George Son M 12 1899 Edmonton Mdx
BARRON, John William Son M 10 1901 Edmonton Mdx
BARRON, Emiie Annie Daughter F 8 1903 Edmonton Mdx
BARRON, Florence Gladys Daughter F 3 1908 Edmonton Mdx
BARRON, Daisy Francis Daughter F 1 1910 Edmonton Mdx
BARRON, George Grandfather Married M 64 1847 Blacksmith Braughing Herts VIEW
BARRON, Francis Amy Grandmother Married 42 years F 63 1848 Mansden Essex

RG number:
RG14 Piece:
7366 Reference:
RG14PN7366 RG78PN357 RD132 SD5 ED16 SN244

Registration District:
Edmonton Sub District:
Edmonton Enumeration District:
16 Parish:
Edmonton

Address:
5 Folkestone Road Edmonton County:
Middlesex


By 1911 Emily and Alfred have had 8 children born alive, 6 are still alive in 1911 but two have died.

This family are living in quite cramped conditions - they have five rooms in the house which includes the kitchen.

Hi

I wonder if someonecould shed some light for me on my family tree.
I am trying to trace the children of Alfred David Barron 1870 and Emily Emma Barron (nott) 1870. (birth place Edmonton Uk)
It says on the freedmd site there where 2 poss 3 childrenbut on the 1911 census on this site it stated there where 6 children.I know they also had a girl (who was my Nan) but she is not listed on freedmd site with the other 2 children.
The only place they are all listed is on this 1911 census.
Which is right?