1911 - OCCUPATIONS AS SURNAMES - Genealogy Chat - Boards

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: July 2008 Posts: 18,042 Send Message	MarieCeleste	Report	20 Mar 2011 16:18
Member Since: July 2008 Posts: 18,042 Send Message	Kathleen, I've looked at originals and do agree that some are just entered as servant and indeed some people are genuinely called Servant. However, the majority that I have looked at are most certainly mis-transcribed.
Member Since: November 2003 Posts: 28,261 Send Message	KathleenBell	Report	20 Mar 2011 16:11
	I don't think they are all transcript errors. If you look at the original census images most are entered as just "servant". Some actually have the surname "Servant". Kath. x
Member Since: July 2008 Posts: 18,042 Send Message	MarieCeleste	Report	20 Mar 2011 15:58
Member Since: July 2008 Posts: 18,042 Send Message	If you're having trouble finding someone in the 1911 then try putting their occupation in the last name field. If you search on Servant as a last name you'll see what I mean. I've reported transcript errors for the dozen or so Housekeepers found, the Servants will take longer! (Guess this may also apply to other census)