Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

HOPE ITS USEFULL

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Dopeydoc

Dopeydoc Report 21 Oct 2011 19:17

A Adult christening
B Birth
C Christening
D Death /Burial
F Birth of 1st child if there is no marriage date
M Marriage
N Census
S Miscellaneous
W Will or Probate

1851 1st census ages were sounded down ,
15 - 19 stated as 15yrs
20 - 24 20
so on and so on....

HOPING THIS MAY BE OF HELP TO SOME-ONE

So many readers have helped me on Genealogy site, Genes

dopeydoc

MargaretM

MargaretM Report 21 Oct 2011 22:59

I have to dispute, Dopeydoc, the 1841 census was the only one where the ages were rounded down.

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 22 Oct 2011 05:36

I agree


it was the 1841 NOT the 1851


and unfortunately not all enumerators did round down the ages



But you can always tell those who did, because the age is shown as a multiple of 5


Joan ....... I've never heard an explanation of it either ...... just that enumerators were told to do it!



sylvia

InspectorGreenPen

InspectorGreenPen Report 22 Oct 2011 06:43

Yes, 1841. For some reason children's ages were not rounded whereas adults where.

Following explanation is courtesy of the Durham Record Office website:-

In the 1841 census, the age of persons over 15 was supposed to be rounded down to the nearest multiple of 5. For example, a person aged 19 would be listed as 15, a person aged 22 would be listed as age 20, and a person age 59 would be listed as 55. In practice, many census officials either did not round down at all or only rounded down for higher ages, such as over 20, or (less frequently) rounded down ages below 15.

In general, the age of a person under 15 is probably accurate to within a year or two. For persons over 15, any age that is not a multiple of 5 is likely also to be accurate – for example, if a person is listed as 27, he or she probably really is 27 or thereabouts, rather than 25.

The area you have to be careful of is persons over age 15 whose age is a multiple of 5 – they may be up to 4 years younger than their census listing shows – so if your ancestor is listed as 50, remember that he or she is likely actually between the ages of 50 and 54.

This, of course, does not even take into account the errors made by census officials and family members reporting the ages of others ! Finally, if the age of a person was unknown, children were supposed to be recorded as “under 20? and adults as “over 20?.

For professional trades, the following abbreviations are used in the census: ‘J’ is for journeyman, ‘AP’ for apprentice, and ‘SH’ for shop man.

Kense

Kense Report 22 Oct 2011 10:47

Another point to bear in mind when comparing ages between the 1841 census and others in that the 1841 census date was 6th June whereas the others were done at the end of March or the first week in April.