Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Parish records

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Tessa

Tessa Report 22 Jan 2012 17:12

Terry for your info there are still Baldwins in the area especially a village nearby called Raydon, as with some name the change over time, I found with my family they went from Murtimer to Mortimer, hope this helps Tessa

Terry

Terry Report 10 Jan 2012 15:52

Thanks for all your answers.
Terry

mgnv

mgnv Report 10 Jan 2012 01:48

Kay?? - I have to disagree. I presume you're referring to Lord Rose's Act
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~framland/acts/1812Act.htm
which mandated thr use of preprinted forms in the Parish Registers.

The marriage details "much like todays" didn't include any parental details, and the form is as KenSE describes. As for births with "full details", these full details didn't include the mother's Maiden Surname, nor the date of birth.

Kay????

Kay???? Report 9 Jan 2012 23:09

In 1813 churches was required by law and issued event books ie---marriage registeres which were filled in with details much like todays ,burials ,naming status and of whom,,,,,,,births with parents and full details ,,think this was under King George 3rd, before this it was done just with scant details of couple names really

Derek

Derek Report 9 Jan 2012 22:53

Thanks kenSE..I rest my case........

Kense

Kense Report 9 Jan 2012 19:10

Another item of information you may get is if one (or both) of the couple was a minor.

I must emphasis that this information is what is in the parish register not in transcripts. Most transcripts available on line only give names, date and place.

After 1754 most parishes used a form something like:

No ---
--- of -----
-- and ----- of ------ were
Married in this ---- by ---------
this ---- Day of ----- in the Year One Thousand ---- Hundred
and ---------- by me --------
This marriage was } ----------
solemnised between Us }-----------
In the } --------
Presence of } --------

Derek

Derek Report 9 Jan 2012 16:02

On the basis that there were no marriage certificates until 1837..I was in much the same position as you.....no cast iron record of the Marriage other than IGI.......was advised to write ( in my case to Manchester Cathedral) for a COPY of the original marriage entry in the PR's..this was 1826......I was able to purchase said copy.............which gave me Bride's name..Grroms \name (my gggrandfather) and his OCCUPATION........Stone Mason....which was the only link that proved I had the right marriage..sorry to be bolshy but i have been on here a long time with my vast collection of Parish Records............and in none of them before about 1830 do you get anything other than the two participants.the information you are suggesting appears on \Marriage certiificates after 1837.....and before that you MIGHT be lucky enough to get Witmesses.........and maybe an odd parent or two. Parish Records may show Groom's occupation from about 1830.........

Derek.

Derek.

mgnv

mgnv Report 9 Jan 2012 00:45

Terry - go to FS and do a place search for Polstead in their Library Catalogand get:

Title Parish registers for Polstead, 1538-1876
Authors Church of England. Parish Church of Polstead (Suffolk) (Main Author)
Notes
Microfilm of original records in the Ipswich and East Suffolk Record Office, Ipswich.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some ordinances didn't occur in some years.
Publication Salt Lake City, Utah : Filmed by the Genealogical Society of Utah, 1975

Note Location Film
Baptisms, 1538-1876. Marriages, 1539-1876. Burials, 1538-1876. Banns, 1755-1876. FHL BRITISH Film 919627


So, at least in 1975 when they were filmed, the regos were in Ipswich at the E Suffolk R O.

Bob

Bob Report 8 Jan 2012 17:38

Try Bury St Edmond s County record office Bob B

Kense

Kense Report 7 Jan 2012 20:57

It depends on how rigorously the forms were filled in but after 1754 you will normally get :
names, marital status and parish of the bride and groom
date of marriage and whether by licence or banns
signatures or marks of the groom, bride and two witnesses and the officiating priest.

You don't normally get the groom's occupation.

Derek

Derek Report 7 Jan 2012 20:06

Not before 1837 you won't!!..at leasr not all those details...you might find the groom's occupation......and that's about all..

Kense

Kense Report 7 Jan 2012 12:01

The original should give you names of witnesses and whether the marriage was by banns or licence. You would also be able to see whether the bride, groom and witnesses could sign their own names.

Joy

Joy Report 7 Jan 2012 11:53

It looks as if they are here:
http://www.suffolk.gov.uk/SRO

You could subscribe (free) to the rootsweb mailing list for Suffolk to see if any lister on it can help.

Terry

Terry Report 7 Jan 2012 11:45

Hi, does anyone know where the parish records for Polstead in Suffolk are kept. I have found a marriage in 1804 between Samuel Boldwin and Mary Warren on Familysearch and was wondering if the original would show any more details. Boldwin is a transcription error,should be Baldwin. Thanks for any help.
Terry