no record on 1911 census

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: December 2004 Posts: 1,236 Send Message	Valerie	Report	11 Feb 2012 04:22
	Yes ...I too have found differences/omissions with the 'GR' censuses ....they haven't been able to explain or acknowledge any discrepancies. Fortunately I have been able to find my 'missing' rellies on copies at the 'LDS' library. Valerie
Member Since: February 2010 Posts: 18,936 Send Message	Flick	Report	10 Feb 2012 23:05
	GR uses the FMP version.............try being flexible with your criteria
Member Since: November 2003 Posts: 28,261 Send Message	KathleenBell	Report	10 Feb 2012 15:58
	Penny's probably right. Different people do the transcribing so the name is probably transcribed as something else. Kath. x
Member Since: November 2004 Posts: 7,602 Send Message	Penny	Report	10 Feb 2012 15:11
	Transcribed differently. Do you mean in trees here, or in records?
Member Since: February 2007 Posts: 4 Send Message	Terence	Report	10 Feb 2012 14:55
Member Since: February 2007 Posts: 4 Send Message	Will someone tell me why having entered a persons name in this site looking for them it throws up 0 results but if i do the same on Ancestry .com i find the record i am looking for i am using the same name & spelling in both cases. :-\|