Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Registration confusion.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
ZZzzz | Report | 13 Apr 2012 19:36 |
I have found 2 birth reg, same 1st name and middle initial, same birth year, place and numbers, it also gives Mothers Maiden name, on the other one surname is same as Mothers Maiden Name, I cannot find a marriage for the parents either. heeeeeeelp please. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 13 Apr 2012 20:03 |
If it's not a person who is still alive, do you want to give details? |
|||
|
ZZzzz | Report | 13 Apr 2012 20:19 |
Not sure if he is still alive, but would the birth reg in both instances be the same? And I haven't found a marriage for the parents. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elisabeth | Report | 13 Apr 2012 20:25 |
The parents were probably not married at the time. If the father attends the registration his name could be used, but the child would also be included with the mother's surname. Even though it appears twice, it is just one registration. |
|||
|
ZZzzz | Report | 13 Apr 2012 20:38 |
Does that mean then that the Mother registered him in her Maiden name and within the same quarter married the Father and then re registered him in Fathers surname. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 13 Apr 2012 20:41 |
ZZzzz - no, they may have married at any time after the baby's birth, but the original birth registration would have been amended. |
|||
|
Elisabeth | Report | 13 Apr 2012 20:55 |
The parents may never have married. |
|||
|
ZZzzz | Report | 13 Apr 2012 21:44 |
Thank you both, I think his parents didn't marry after all but had other children. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 14 Apr 2012 03:58 |
ZZzz - there aren't 2 registrations. There's just one rego, and just one b.cert. If you look at a b.cert pre-1969q2, then you'll see there is no column that specifies what the child's surname is. There's a col for "Name, and surname of father, and one for "Name, surname, and maiden surname of mother", so if a kid is rego'ed with parents with difft surnames, then of course there should be 2 entries in the GRO index, one under each surname, but both pointing to the same b.cert. |
|||
|
WhiffingSiggs | Report | 14 Apr 2012 18:24 |
mgnv, why would there be 2 registrations? I'm curious as I've a family in my direct line where the children are double registered. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 14 Apr 2012 19:00 |
Its all down to inheritance! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 15 Apr 2012 08:29 |
Briefly, a load of cobblers. |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 15 Apr 2012 09:06 |
OK. May be my previous post should have said listed/transcribed twice. I knew what I meant - lol |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 15 Apr 2012 11:36 |
The GRO index is just that, an index. Just like any book, there can be several entries in the index referring to a single item in the book itself. |