Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Help with Registration District
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Phyll | Report | 6 May 2012 12:23 |
Please can someone tell me if a birth was in Crawley in 1868 where the registration took place. Would it have been in Horsham at that time. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Porkie_Pie | Report | 6 May 2012 12:30 |
I think it was EAST GRINSTEAD until 1880 when it became incorporated in to Horsham |
|||
|
Phyll | Report | 6 May 2012 13:29 |
Thanks Roy |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 6 May 2012 15:30 |
Its possible too that the birth wasn't registered . there were no penalties for non registration till 1875 when it became the parents responsibility to register rather than the registrar seeking out births in his area |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Phyll | Report | 6 May 2012 15:58 |
Thanks Shirley |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 6 May 2012 16:03 |
Horsham to Crawley is only about 5 or 6 miles |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sue C | Report | 6 May 2012 16:25 |
I don't think you can discount what you have found. |
|||
|
jax | Report | 6 May 2012 17:02 |
I was thinking the same Sue as I used to live in Crawley up until a couple of years ago. Probably back then Horsham was a biggish town and Crawley a villiage? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sue C | Report | 6 May 2012 17:15 |
I think you're right Jax. |
|||
|
Porkie_Pie | Report | 6 May 2012 17:24 |
I was led to believe that, Before 1875 the registrar was responsible for seeking out new births and the birth registration, so in that context i doubt that the registrar registered births out of his/her area, this was the main reason that some births were not registered, |
|||
|
jax | Report | 6 May 2012 17:38 |
I was just thinking about when I had my first child....she was born in Havering but we registered her birth in Brentwood as that was where we lived. It comes up on the index as Havering though |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Phyll | Report | 6 May 2012 18:26 |
Thank you one and all for your help. I have now spent some time looking at other rellies birth and registratiion areas and I have come to the conclusion that the one born in Crawley was registered in Horsham. A couple of siblings and cousins show their birth area as Slaugham but registered Horsham. I am going to send for certficate and hope it confirms this |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 6 May 2012 21:14 |
I don't know how reliable it is, but looking at http://maps.familysearch.org/ it seems the 1851 parish of Crawley was in 2 chunks. One lay between Ifield and Worth - now in the heart of Crawley town - and the other lay between Slaugham and Lower Breeding |