Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
A Servant at 79 yrs old?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
^ ^ ^ Ancient Egyptian Spinx ^ ^ ^ | Report | 6 May 2012 21:25 |
Found this to seem really odd. On ancestry,1861 census shows a MYLES SUMNER brn Leyland 1795 a farmer living with Mary Amberg born 1782 which makes her 79 and described as servant and on original document as housekeeper. Seems really strange that someone of this age and especially in 1861 when people were older for their yrs than nowadays would be a servant at 79 , or could it be that for some unknown reason our Mr Sumner was telling a little lie. Any ideas out there ? :-S |
|||
|
Joy | Report | 6 May 2012 21:39 |
Well, I have Ag Labs about that age and older, so I see no reason why servants should not be that age, too :) |
|||
|
Porkie_Pie | Report | 6 May 2012 21:52 |
Not many had a pension in those days so plenty of people had to work until the day they died |
|||
|
Chris in Sussex | Report | 6 May 2012 22:19 |
Unless they had managed to put something by or relatives that could assist then the alternative was the workhouse. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 6 May 2012 22:50 |
just to show Myles age was right |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 6 May 2012 22:57 |
is the name definitely Amberg on the original? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 7 May 2012 09:53 |
Nothing unusual in that - people had to eat, and have a roof over their heads |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 7 May 2012 20:50 |
Life expectancy for pensioners was at least ten years in Victorian Britain in rural areas - there was the dreadful loss of mothers in childbirth and a huge number died as babies/toddlers - but thereafter they usually had good sanitation, access to vegetables, no lack of exercise and limited access to fats. The main reason that life expectancy at birth was no more than say 40 was because so many died as babies, which brought down the averages dramatically. I don't think that modern medicine had much impact on pensioners' life expectancy until fairly recently. |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 7 May 2012 21:02 |
Absolutely. |
|||
|
^ ^ ^ Ancient Egyptian Spinx ^ ^ ^ | Report | 13 May 2012 20:51 |
So sorry to everyone that relied for not getting back to you sooner, I have a very busy life so sometimes its days or even weeks before I my computer off again. Didnt realise that people worked to a ripe old age in those days but it all makes sense considering there were no pensions. Thank You all . |