Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Age at Death

Login to Add Reply Watch This
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Jonesey

Jonesey Report 16 May 2012 17:08

Sheila,

As the death was registered by a non family member and as the headstone engraving appears to have been commissioned long after her death I would be more inclined to believe the birth c1795 as indicated on the census returns.

As you said earlier that date was consistent on the returns. I would also think that there was a greater probability of an unmarried woman having her only child at the age of about 25 rather than at 42 years old.

Researching:
Don't put off until tomorrow doing what you can do today. If you like doing it today you can do it again tomorrow. Be kind to your children for it is they who will decide which care home you end up in.

Sheila

Sheila Report 16 May 2012 16:57

Jonesey,

I am confident of the census returns because she always lived with her daughter. She is buried in the same plot as her grandson. I assume that the headstone was erected after his death because before then they would not be able to afford one.

There is no address on the death certificate and the death was reported by someone who was not a family member. I presume she was a neighbour present at the death.

The ages on the death certificate and headstone agree.

Sheila

Jonesey

Jonesey Report 16 May 2012 15:37

Peoples ages on early census records should always be taken as a guide rather than as fact as some people "Adjusted" their age or perhaps did not really know when and where they were born. 17 years difference however is quite a gap which I would personally question as being correct.

How confident are you that the gravestone, the death certificate and the census records are all for the same person?

It is worth remembering that whoever gave the information to the registrar and to the monumental mason could only have been able to relay information that they thought was accurate when it may not have been.

Researching:
Don't put off until tomorrow doing what you can do today. If you like doing it today you can do it again tomorrow. Be kind to your children for it is they who will decide which care home you end up in.

brummiejan

brummiejan Report 16 May 2012 15:34

Sheila, I doubt if I can help personally, but I suggest you put her details on here for folks to have a look.
Jan

Researching:
Myatt, Hanks, Eccleston, Powell, Clungunford, Birmingham

Sheila

Sheila Report 16 May 2012 15:19

I am trying to find the correct date of birth for my Gr.Gr. Grandmother. On her headstone and death certificate her age is given as 84 making her date of birth 1778. On all census from 1841-1861 her date of birth is given as 1795.
I have looked at the Parish Records for where she says that she was born but cannot find her name. I have also looked at neighbouring parishes.

If 1778 is the correct date she would have been about forty two when her only daughter was born. She never married.

Do you think that I will never solve this puzzle?