Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Deliberate mistake?

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

wisechild

wisechild Report 10 Oct 2012 14:54

On the 1911 census, 2 sisters shown as aged 0.
I knew it was an error because one of them got married in 1921.
The original shows 1 aged 81/2 & the other 6 1/2.
Both transcribed with yob 1911.
Was it too difficult to work out the halves without a calculator?

Jonesey

Jonesey Report 10 Oct 2012 15:23

The person who transcribed the records obviously assumed that their ages had been recorded as months rather than years.

More a case of lack of knowledge of the principles of biology rather than weak mathematical abilities.

wisechild

wisechild Report 10 Oct 2012 15:37

You´re probably right Jonesey. Hadn´t thought of that, but then, I knew how old they should be.

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 10 Oct 2012 18:01

Remember that the people transcribing probably don't know what a numerical half is............they probably are familiar only with decimals

I hope you've posted the necessary correction(s)

wisechild

wisechild Report 11 Oct 2012 07:08

Sure have Reggie