births

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: August 2003 Posts: 63,531 Send Message	ErikaH	Report	27 Sep 2013 23:07
	The birth would probably have been registered in the woman's name.......... BUT.............look for all Jamieson births after the date when he abandoned his family.....................if he was present when the birth was registered, it could have been in his name.............. Only the cert will confirm...............but, being practical, I doubt you will ever actually know
Member Since: January 2006 Posts: 1,545 Send Message	Tiny	Report	27 Sep 2013 19:36
	thanks .. don`t no mothers name , just that there is another child to the family father william wood jamieson . he ran off with a woman and we no , as he told us he had another child but didn`t give any more info . but thanks for your answers Tiny :-)
Member Since: February 2003 Posts: 12,081 Send Message	Andrew	Report	27 Sep 2013 19:25
	If the father were married to the mother, then presumably the child would have his surname and you could search the records (assuming England/Wales) like that. If the child has mothers maiden name, then no. Andy
Member Since: June 2007 Posts: 21,069 Send Message	jax	Report	27 Sep 2013 19:24
	Only by the surname
	Researching: Nothing much
Member Since: January 2006 Posts: 1,545 Send Message	Tiny	Report	27 Sep 2013 19:19
	is there a way to find births by using the fathers name only ? thanks Tiny