Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

endy bits on surnames (SON)

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Winterose

Winterose Report 10 Jan 2015 12:34

That's very interesting, you are so right +++DetEcTive+++ the TAX MAN ofcourse !!

Winterose x

+++DetEcTive+++

+++DetEcTive+++ Report 10 Jan 2015 11:31

Once upon a time, no one had surnames. They were given forenames.

After a while it became necessary to identify individuals. In Britain, they were either referred to as the 'son of' or if adults, by their occupations.

I don't know when the use of surnames became the norm - probably sometime in the Medieval period or before. Possibly because the tax man cometh!!


Winterose

Winterose Report 10 Jan 2015 08:09

i understand about the historical Mc /Mac being the son of, lets use Mc/Mac Donald this was regarded as the son of Donald & i'm guessing so is Donaldson, just making a leap here, does this mean the surname was/is in fact Donald.

Hopefully i did not cause any upset to anyone, its just that i have a good number of Mc/MacDonalds McWilliams Morris/Morrisons etc,...so was just wondering about the more contemporary evolution of that type of surname.......

Anyway regards all Winterose .

Dame*Shelly*(

Dame*Shelly*("\(*o*)/") Report 9 Jan 2015 22:14

i have son in my sername i would not sand right if i drop it
so think ill keep it :-)

AnnCardiff

AnnCardiff Report 9 Jan 2015 20:36

similarly, I think Mac stands for son of as does ap in Welsh

Jacqueline

Jacqueline Report 9 Jan 2015 14:19

The names would originally have been without the suffix............but you're talking here about mediaeval times.

A lad would have been known as' son of' which eventually became part of the surname when the surname system was introduced

Lots about it if you google

Andysmum

Andysmum Report 9 Jan 2015 14:17

They date back to the days when people used first names only and Williamson was, quite literally, William's son. Eventually they turned into surnames.

Although they would originally have been the same family, they are definitely not the same in later years. If you ignore the "son" bit, I think you will be making future problems for yourself.

In Wales they would have been Ap William, in Scotland Mac/McWilliam and in Ireland O'William, although I have never actually heard the last one.

Winterose

Winterose Report 9 Jan 2015 13:33

Hello all

i've often wondered if surnames like Williams & Williamson, Harris & Harrison Swan & Swanson ; Morris & Morrison & Robert & Robertson etc are, could be one & the same surname . Is there a general rule or does one just stick rigidly to Robert or Harris & forget the SON.

Better to know for sure than to wonder.....

thanks, looking forward to you replies !