Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

twins

Login to Add Reply Watch This

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Berniethatwas

Berniethatwas Report 5 Mar 2015 19:36

Possible? 1851 was taken on 30th March, 1861 on 7th April. If one was born between those dates they would have been 7 last birthday 1851 and 18 in the next one.
B

Researching:
Avatar - George Cluni-kuni. Not from the South Hams.

friendlywelshdragon

friendlywelshdragon Report 5 Mar 2015 19:18

Hi I have found something puzzling on some of the censuses .
In 1851 there are twins listed . William Morgan and Thomas Morgan , both 7 years old But on the 1861 census William's age is given as 18 and Thomas as 17.
Would it be done to give priority to an older son to inherit ?

:-S

Researching:
Evans, King, Thomas , Jones, Maesteg .bridgend , Cardigan, Bristol, Somerset,

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2