Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

BMD Scan

Login to Add Reply Watch This
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

ElizabethK

ElizabethK Report 21 May 2015 11:45

Can anyone work out which of these is the correct one as I would like to post a correction :-S

4th Q 1862

William HUTCHINS Vol 2 Page 587 Abingdon
Elizabeth KIMBREY Vol 2 Page 887 Abingdon
{
They married in the December of 1862}

Edit
They married in the October :-S

greyghost

greyghost Report 21 May 2015 11:59

I'm pretty sure the 587 is correct.

Using freebmd and just inputting Marriages, Dec Qtr1862, Abingdon - both names are there, but the Abingdon against Elizabeth is in Italics and the Page number is way out from the rest in that quarter. If you look at the original then it looks like a bad 5 has been interpreted as an 8 but with reservations by the transcriber

(Note Hannah Hazell also in Italics and number 1028 way out - looks like 628 on original and Anna Maria Parker 681 should be 631)

EDIT - FMP has given his number as 587 and hers as 557 !!

Kense

Kense Report 21 May 2015 15:02

If you use freeBMD and look under
Information
Statistics
Districts
Page Ranges

You get tables of valid page ranges for each district year and quarter.

The valid page range for Abingdon Q4 1862 is 563-632.

http://www.freebmd.org.uk/cgi/district-page-map.pl?file=Abingdon.csv

ElizabethK

ElizabethK Report 21 May 2015 15:39

Thank you - it would seem to be the 587 as greyghost suggests which fits within the pages

Your help appreciated :-)