Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Magnus Anderson 'Bigamy and Divorce' Help Please

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

David

David Report 26 Nov 2015 09:53

Magnus Anderson married Eleanor Mullen in 1915 (bigamously?)
1933: Divorce - Appelant Eleanor May Anderson, respondent Magnus Anderson (National Archives).
Problem: I can't find any further account of the divorce proceedings in newspapers or elsewhere, which is puzzling.
Please can anyone find information about the divorce proceedings and outcome?
David

MarieCeleste

MarieCeleste Report 26 Nov 2015 09:57

Hello David, have you requested an estimate to have the divorce records digitised by National Archives? Or are you able to get to Kew to view them?

I would expect that if their marriage really was bigamous then they wouldn't actually need a divorce.

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 26 Nov 2015 10:03

If the couple had married bigamously there wouldn't have been a divorce - the marriage would have been annulled as if it had never taken place.

The fact that the National Archives have a record of a divorce would suggest to me that the marriage was legal.

When my parents divorced in 1960 there was no mention of it in newspapers as far as I am aware.

This is the marriage:-

First name(s) ELEANOR M
Last name MULLEN
Marriage quarter 4
Marriage year 1915
Registration month -
MarriageFinderâ„¢ ELEANOR M MULLEN married
MAGNUS ANDERSON
Spouse's last name ANDERSON
District TOXTETH PARK
District number -
County Lancashire
Country England
Volume 8B
Page 438

Kath. x

MarieCeleste

MarieCeleste Report 26 Nov 2015 10:07

Forgot to ask where this all took place ....

Re: the newspapers, divorce was a lot less common in the 1930s so there often were articles in the newspapers then, especially if it was a "juicy" case. More recently, our local newspaper used to publish weekly lists of all decrees nisi and absolute - that was up until the 1970s - so I guess it depends on location.

nameslessone

nameslessone Report 26 Nov 2015 17:45

I viewed some of the papers for a 1920's divorce in Kew.

I didn't think of looking in the press at the time, but have recently done a newspaper search for the husband regarding something else and found nothing.

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 26 Nov 2015 18:46

Interestingly, there are two entries for the marriage on lancs bmd ..............


Lancashire Marriage indexes for the years: 1915

MULLEN Eleanor M ANDERSON Magnus Toxteth Park, Register Office or Registrar Attended Liverpool REG_TP/53/11
MULLEN Eleanor M ANDERSON Magnus Toxteth Park, Register Office or Registrar Attended Liverpool REG_TP/53/12


The registration numbers are different, with no indicationas to why

+++DetEcTive+++

+++DetEcTive+++ Report 26 Nov 2015 23:49

Could they have made an error on the first form and had to re-issue it?

Although not quite the same, something similar occured with a birth certificate. The 1st had the wrong surname on it. It was the surname they used in the community, but not a 'legal' on. That one was cancelled and a different recorded. Both the gro references are on Freebmd, but only the corrected BC would be issued.

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 27 Nov 2015 00:59

I can't see any difference between the two references for the Mullen / Anderson marriage. And, unfortunately, lancs bmd only gives the bmds for the year, not by quarter.

There are not two entries on Freebmd so far as I can see,