Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
help disapeared after 1851 census
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
ErikaH | Report | 13 Apr 2007 22:01 |
If Rebecca was giving birth around 1900, she must have been born a lot later than 1845 Reg |
|||
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!) | Report | 13 Apr 2007 22:06 |
So Maude's birth was not registered? Or could it have been registered under a name other than Kilbey? Have you found a baptism record for her? Jill |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
sarah | Report | 13 Apr 2007 22:07 |
reggie thought if we follow rebecca's one may have a child and call her rebecca we know it is a long shot but no other allertons in the same area and this family lived about 20 min walk from kilbey's jenny |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 13 Apr 2007 22:08 |
Jenny, I'm not doubting your information. What I'm doubting is, if your gr-nan wasn't registered until her death, it's only hearsay that she was born in 1900. People can always be out a couple of years when giving ages. Ozi. |
|||
|
sarah | Report | 13 Apr 2007 22:08 |
jill my nan has only death cert and birth cert that was issued when maude died i have married cert went registery office to get it jenny |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 13 Apr 2007 22:10 |
Is the Allerton address in 1851 20 mins from the Kilbey address in 1901? |
|||
|
sarah | Report | 13 Apr 2007 22:10 |
ozi sorry she was 23 on marriage cert got married 1923 jenny |
|||
|
sarah | Report | 13 Apr 2007 22:14 |
ozi yes allerton1851 20 min kilbey 1901 hopeing allertons never moved jenny |
|||
|
sarah | Report | 13 Apr 2007 22:24 |
ozi yes jenny |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 13 Apr 2007 22:25 |
Did they live around the Battersea area all the time we're talking about? |
|||
|
sarah | Report | 13 Apr 2007 22:27 |
my family have always lived in battersea/clapham jenny |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 13 Apr 2007 22:36 |
This is a real conundrum. I can't find a Maud* with mother Reb* that suits. I wonder if she left the area to have Maude or if Maude is living with relatives? |
|||
|
sarah | Report | 13 Apr 2007 22:51 |
big brick wall i know we have been told maude was born 34 bellville road battersea lived here on wed/cert but 1901 wright family living there rebecca meant to be lodger there rebecca was also a wet nurse for a lord & lady lindsley in chelsea about this time but i can't find them either they also had a house in edinburgh search 1901 scottish cencus rebecca not there if we never had a photo of rebecca i might think maude was found in a sandpit ha ha jenny |
|||
|
Ajwyorks | Report | 14 Apr 2007 14:37 |
How do you know that the John Kilbey married to Lavinia is Maude's father? You have mentioned that the marriage cert said he was a timber merchant but Lavinia's husband is an insurance agent. Are you certain that Maude didn't just make up a father for herself when she was married as she didn't like to look illegitimate? There has been a thread about this and it seems the most common method was for the person to take their own surname add John and state he was dead and give him a profession. |