Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Marriage with different page numbers?
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dizzy | Report | 3 Apr 2007 16:55 |
|
I have been searching for a marriage today after recieving a birth cert this morning. Parents on cert are Mary Jane Bumstead Formerly Fisher and Thomas Edward Bumstead. Child born 1867. I have found both of them marrying in the same quarter, same parish, same year but on different pages (using FreeBMD). Each of them is an entry with 3 names. Is it possible? |
|||
|
Dizzy | Report | 3 Apr 2007 17:00 |
|
Marriages Mar 1865 (>99%) Crain Daniel Camberwell 1d 607 Fisher Mary Jane Rotherhithe 1d 607 Salmons Susan Camberwell 1d 607 Marriages Mar 1865 (>99%) Bumstead Thomas Edward Rotherhithe 1d 687 Denman Elizabeth Rotherhithe 1d 687 Ford Charles Rotherhithe 1d 687 |
|||
|
Judith | Report | 3 Apr 2007 17:01 |
|
Mary Jane has been mistranscribed as the other two with her page number are in a different district. I guess the transcriber read the 8 as a 0. You could double check this by looking at the scan of the index page. |
|||
|
Dizzy | Report | 3 Apr 2007 17:10 |
|
Thanx Judith, I will do that. |
|||
|
Grandma6 | Report | 3 Apr 2007 17:28 |
|
I agree with Judith,both ref no`s should read 1d 607 Nana |
|||
|
Judith | Report | 3 Apr 2007 17:38 |
|
You don't quite agree with me actually Nana, I say both should be 687 as that's the Rotherhithe number :-) |
|||