Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Can anyone shed some light on this?

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Elizabeth

Elizabeth Report 28 Mar 2007 18:22

It is a mistake because when you look at lydia hollis it has her down as wife with 3 children at home but when you look at sarah it has her living in some institiute like workhouse,

Ivy

Ivy Report 28 Mar 2007 18:14

I agree, it is very odd. The film (I'll pm you) shows H+W (Lydia) plus three children, although Ancestry transcript includes other family members. They're not on the next page - this was the last house for that village, and there are blank lines after this household.

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it Report 28 Mar 2007 18:12

Its a big mix up . if you look at page 1 theres no sarah hollis on it. But if you look at page 14 theres Henry with wife Lydia and children William 4 Jonathon 3 and Daisy 7 months The summary for the page has a mix of people on page 1 and people on page 14 but i cant see Sarah on either page Shirley

Amy

Amy Report 28 Mar 2007 17:58

Source Citation: Class: RG12; Piece: 2487; Folio 81; Page 1; GSU roll: 6097597. 1891 Cenus There is one HENRY HOLLIS but both SARAH HOLLIS & LYDIA HOLLIS have him down as their spouse. Is this just a mistake on the transcript?