Genealogy Chat

I misread you thread thought you were looking for a Birth in 1861 !!!! Senior moment I think cos it didnt register when you were saying transcribers. Never mind its found anyway/ Shirley

Kath, Yes checked the details. Printout says RG number: RG09 Piece: 1235 Folio: 14 Page: 23 Reg District: Guiltcross Sub District: 1 Banham Enum. District: 1 Parish: Banham Blowed if I can get the image on Ancestry with those details. Maureen

Ancestry say these pages are missing in 1861 but 1235 is not there.... Pieces from RG9 where all parishes are missing (we do not have ANY records for these pieces): 145 407 903 1234 4015 4131 4196 4344 219 601 1039 3388 4022 4137 4291 4389 Pieces from RG9 where one or more parishes are missing (we have SOME records for these pieces): 217 690 2211 3913 4027 4143 4173 4211 4265 4295 4330 220 758 2247 3984 4041 4146 4174 4225 4266 4298 229 837 2365 3991 4077 4149 4178 4228 4270 4299 473 863 2625 4010 4078 4154 4184 4231 4272 4301 485 952 3278 4013 4079 4161 4185 4256 4274 4304 499 1047 3652 4014 4132 4163 4187 4261 4276 4309 541 1194 3735 4024 4133 4164 4190 4262 4280 4314 565 1984 3855 4025 4138 4165 4202 4263 4290 4319 Georgina.

Definitely them :) Thanks very much! I wish Ancestry would admit to not having all the pages on. Makes life much easier when you know something's meant to be missing.

I can't get that Ancestry page to come up either Glitter Baby. Are the numbers right? Kath. x

From findmypast Jonah age 56 born Ashby, Norfolk,farmer 50 acres emp 1 lab Eliza age 50 born Burgh Apton Elizabeth daughter ag 14 born Banham Charles son age 12 born Banham Reg Dist: Guiltcross Parish Banham Address: Great Green, Banham

Thank you Glitter Baby :D Not on Ancestry though :( Oh well, least I know I'm not going mad! lol

I don't think it's mistranscribed, Reg, but you can have a go if you want. Name is Jonah Hazell, b1805 Norfolk. Also not there is wife Eliza, b1811 and son Charles, b1849.

RG9 Piece 1235 Folio 14 Page 23

But they must be there on ancestry if the page has been scanned. do you want another pair of eyes??

Mistranscribed? Give us some names etc...........let us have a 'dig' I found one family today on Ancestry, where the father and mother were supposedly ANN and EMMA!! Reg

Looking for someone in 1861, can't find them. Assume then dead - but no - they died in 1870 (name not very common). Have a look on Findmypast - and there they are, large as life! Shame I don't have any credits for it lol

I don't understand Ancestry either...can't find myself on it, but as you say....Large as life on FindMyPast. There must be an explanation. Hopefully someone can explain. Tina x

Ancestry and Findmypast appear to have used different transcribers so you will get different results. Maureen