Inquests in 1895

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: June 2005 Posts: 781 Send Message	Brit	Report	9 Feb 2007 22:05
Member Since: June 2005 Posts: 781 Send Message	Thank you Jennifer, you are probably right. He must have been a pretty healthy old chap up until then, he was still working, so they probably were surprised when he died.
Member Since: June 2004 Posts: 642 Send Message	Jennifer	Report	9 Feb 2007 19:40
Member Since: June 2004 Posts: 642 Send Message	Yes Maggie, Inquests were quite comon at that time, particularly if there was something questionable about then death. I would usually advise looking for a newspaper account of the inquest, but I suspect that as the cause was a heart attack, it would not have warranted enough interest for a report in the press. Jennifer
Member Since: June 2005 Posts: 781 Send Message	Brit	Report	9 Feb 2007 16:39
Member Since: June 2005 Posts: 781 Send Message	I have just received a copy of my great grandfather's death cert. I had hoped to get a name of the informant, but instead it says Certificate received from G.D. Thomas Coroner for London.Inquest held this 10th February 1895. Was it usual for inquests to be held in those days in a sudden death? He was 72, and it was determined he died of a heart attack.