age of consent in 1848?

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: May 2004 Posts: 2,077 Send Message	Paul Barton, Special Agent	Report	9 Feb 2007 06:31
Member Since: May 2004 Posts: 2,077 Send Message	If you're basing his age on the 1841 census, ages were invariably rounded up or down by as much as five years. It's not a reliable means of establishing ages. Have you found him on any other censuses?
Member Since: March 2003 Posts: 7,819 Send Message	InspectorGreenPen	Report	8 Feb 2007 17:00
Member Since: March 2003 Posts: 7,819 Send Message	Age of consent i.e. without parents approval was 21. Full meant 21 or over. Most likely explanation is that he lied about his age, not an uncommon occurrence, especially if you have other evidence to prove it.
Member Since: January 2004 Posts: 17 Send Message	Elizabeth	Report	8 Feb 2007 16:57
Member Since: January 2004 Posts: 17 Send Message	Got the marriage certificate of a chap married in 1848, the census says was born in 1830---does this mean that the age of consent was 18 in 1848 (he is described as 'of full age' on the certificate). I thought age of consent to marry was 21 up until recently? Could it be that he was not born in 1830? Liz