Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

So it went on then too!!!!!

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Kathlyn

Kathlyn Report 19 Jan 2007 16:26

I have been taking stock of marriages and births in my trees and boy oh boy but some of them only just made it to the alter before the birth of 'little Jimmy/Sarah'. My 2xgreat grandparents had 5 children that I have managed to find, 1857..1860..1862..1866..1867 and they only decided to tie the knot in 1875!!!!!....Perhaps Argos did not have a wedding list then......lol lol. Kathlyn

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 19 Jan 2007 16:31

To be honest, I think that my generation in our family are the first to have been married before being pregnant (at least on my mother's side). I always look for marriages in the same qtr or the qtr. before the birth of the first child, as a matter of course these days. Kath. x

Kathlyn

Kathlyn Report 19 Jan 2007 16:35

When I obtained my nan and granddads marriage cert. i found that my mum was well and truely on the way when they tripped up the aisle. Kathlyn

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it Report 19 Jan 2007 16:38

YEP Victorian values we held as so Uptight still didnt match what we eventually found went on, but its surprising then to see how many illegitmate children there were!. Relationships always went on and in view of so few preventative measures that were available its not surprising now of how many illegimate children arrived. What surprises me me tho that in the 1960.s,despite Flower Power,it was STILLthe ultirmate 'sin' to be an unmarried mum. Shirley

Trudy

Trudy Report 19 Jan 2007 16:41

Same on both sides of my family - great gran and grandad married 22nd Dec - grandad arrived 11th Jan!!!!!!!

An Olde Crone

An Olde Crone Report 19 Jan 2007 16:56

Illegitimacy rates have been at a constant average of 10% a year since records began in 1542! The only blips in these figures are during periods of war - the illegitimacy rate rises - and the most recent 20 years of course, make a nonsense of any sort of averages. Illegitimacy in this instance means - parents who were not married to each other at the time of the child's birth. Most of this was down to the church, which thundered hell and damnation to sex outside marriage. The congregation gravely nodded their heads in agreement - and got on with doing what has always come naturally, on the quiet. OC

Kathlyn

Kathlyn Report 19 Jan 2007 17:09

Hi Robert, Maybe they were on 'Sabaticle' or the one in the middle did not survive. Kathlyn

An Olde Crone

An Olde Crone Report 19 Jan 2007 17:18

At the other end of the scale, my farming ancestors never married until the girl had produced at least one son, thus proving her fertility. The daughters often had several illegitimate children, and I have read that farmers were in no hurry to marry off their daughters to unsuitable (i.e. non-farming) men. Having a few illegitimate children in tow did not stop the daughters eventually making a 'good' marriage - the groom being pacified by the thought of the possible inheritance of a farm. OC