Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Puzzle for 2007
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
BrianW | Report | 1 Jan 2007 08:35 |
See below |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
BrianW | Report | 1 Jan 2007 08:49 |
I am still stuck on my paternal grandmother, known as Hannah Jane Harris born c1871 but no record of her birth is to found. There was a Harris family (Charles & Jane) at 4 Middle Street, Shacklewell in Hackney district for about 40 years (1851-1891 censuses). Handed down is a birth certificate for a Jane Macey born in November 1871 at that address. Her mother was Elizabeth Macey formerly Crawley. Jane Harris's maiden name was Crawley. The certificate was obtained in 1936, when Jane Macey would have been 65. So maybe obtained for a pension or insurance claim? Charles and Elizabeth Macey seem to have come out of thin air and gone the same way. I surmise that Jane Macey was brought up by the Harrises as their child, taking the name Hannah Jane Harris, but how to prove it ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 1 Jan 2007 12:20 |
Just pointing out the lodger 1871 Elizabeth Mally abt 1847 Shacklunll Lodger Hackney St John London |
|||
|
BrianW | Report | 1 Jan 2007 13:01 |
It may well be Elizabeth Macey mistranscribed - I must look at the original image. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 1 Jan 2007 13:40 |
The image definitely doesn't look like Macey. More like Malley or Malby. Kath. x |
|||
|
BrianW | Report | 1 Jan 2007 14:29 |
There is a possibility that it is their daughter (although in 1871 she seems to be described as an unmarried visitor) who appears on the 1861 census aged 13. Certainly the age is right to within a year and the place of birth would be correct. But Macey/Mall(e)y would be her married name ! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 1 Jan 2007 15:09 |
So if Elizabeth is their daughter she was born before her parents married making her name Crawley not Harris. marriage Jane Crawley 1846 Apr-May-Jun Hackney Greater London, London, |
|||
|
BrianW | Report | 1 Jan 2007 15:43 |
I've got that marriage certificate: 1 June 1946. |
|||
Researching: |