Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Two different places on same census ????
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Elizabeth | Report | 7 Mar 2007 19:13 |
|
Yes - my great-grandfather in the 1891 census. He was in the Royal Navy and his ship was in port in Portsmouth. All the men attached to the ship were given in the census, but then at the top (where you don't always look) it says 'Not on board'. He is also at home with his family. |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 7 Mar 2007 18:55 |
|
I have had similar with Edward F Bishop at home with wife and children in Bitton but also as visitor with his parents in Wiltshire! This seems to be a recurring theme with 1891 census! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 1 Oct 2006 23:33 |
|
Found one today which solved a mystery in OH's tree which has been bugging me for some time. On the 1901 a relly of his called Nancy was married to William and their oldest child was 12, but in 1891 William was unmarried and with his parents, and I couldn't find Nancy or the oldest child. At last, today, I found William, Nancy and the child all together on the 1891! So William is with his wife and children, and also with his parents. (I'm sure it was just a mistake rather than a secret marriage, as his oldest two children were born in the same tiny village where his parents lived!) Kate. |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 1 Oct 2006 23:19 |
|
Yes, I have 1841 my great great grandmother Mary with her children at home with Mary's husband and simultaneously staying with Mary's parents - which is a big help as it confirms her maiden name and gave me their ages, so I could find their baptisms! 1871 My great grandfather at home with wife, children and his widowed mother as well as at sea with his elder brother. Useful because elder brother is very elusive, so it confirmed he was a fisherman. Makes up for all the folk I can't find ONCE, never mind twice! |
|||
|
Dawnieher3headaches | Report | 1 Oct 2006 21:29 |
|
I've got one at home and on board a ship cor wish I could split myself in two would solve a lot of problems |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Katie Hartlepool | Report | 1 Oct 2006 20:57 |
|
I have one of mine who is listed at home eith her husband and children in the 1851c and at the same time nursing her mother ay another address. Definately the same person as not a common name. Kathryn |
|||
|
Linda G | Report | 1 Oct 2006 20:54 |
|
Strange isn't it. Mine is visiting with sister and also a couple of roads away with wife and family. Linda |
|||
|
Chris in Sussex | Report | 1 Oct 2006 20:43 |
|
Same as Kim But mine was with Mum and Dad in Battersea London and then with Grandmother and Great Grandfather in Essex LOL Chris |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kim | Report | 1 Oct 2006 20:37 |
|
Yes a child staying with grandparents also recorded at home- in same street, must have run up and down road whilst enumerator still going round!! Think the confusion came with who lives in the house and who is there that night i.e only visitors. Kim |
|||
|
Linda G | Report | 1 Oct 2006 20:33 |
|
I am pretty sure I have the same person in two places on 1891 census..... Anyone else had this happen? Linda |
|||