Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Birth Certs Can they misrecord a surname?

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Julie

Julie Report 30 Sep 2006 20:27

Referring to last thread... Can surnames also be mistranscribed on Birth certs if the person registering the birth is illiteriate? Julie

Angela now in Wilts (not North Devon)

Angela now in Wilts (not North Devon) Report 30 Sep 2006 20:34

Julie Logically I would say yes. I have an illiterate ancestor whose christian name is variously, Ann Norah & Honoria! Angela

Gwyn in Kent

Gwyn in Kent Report 30 Sep 2006 20:47

I have the birth cert of a 'girl' who was really a boy. Mother was illiterate and registrar probably misheard the first name. Anything is possible. I posted a thread once about all the certificates I have with wrong information. Gwyn

Angela now in Wilts (not North Devon)

Angela now in Wilts (not North Devon) Report 30 Sep 2006 20:56

Gwyneth That reminds me, I have a child registered as Henry Francis Campbell Ritchie, who was really Emily Frances Campbell Ritchie! Declaration is listed on the cert forty years after the birth! Mother signed with an x on original birth cert, so obviously didn't realise at the time. Angela

Julie

Julie Report 30 Sep 2006 21:02

Angela that is my point aswell, My grandmother x 2s mother is recorded as dodden, but i am sure that is incorrect but can't find any record to prove otherwise apart from LDS marriage... and well that is not always correct either.. Julie

Montmorency

Montmorency Report 30 Sep 2006 21:39

She's Mary Ann Soden in the GRO marriage index. This seems to be right -- taking age and birthplace from 1861, there's a Mary Ann Soden at Kingswinford/Brierley Hill in 1851 who fits, and her christening in IGI (1837 Brierley Hill)

Unknown

Unknown Report 1 Oct 2006 11:05

Any record can be wrong! Either on the original document or on a transcription or index. I've got mistakes on censuses, certificates, gravestones, electoral rolls....

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 1 Oct 2006 11:26

Like Nell, I have mistakes on all of these documents, and on headstones. All the information is given or recorded by human beings and there is always scope for human error. Kath. x

Colin

Colin Report 1 Oct 2006 12:06

I had a lot of difficulty tracing a family from a birth certificate...mother gave her maiden name as Fairwall.........possibly the way she pronounced it.....her actual name was Thirlwall

Judith

Judith Report 1 Oct 2006 15:16

Julie, Yes the surname might have been misheard by the registrar when the birth was originally registered. But as it is quite hard to say Mary Ann Soden so that it sounds like Mary Ann Dodden (unless perhaps you have a very bad cold!) I wonder if the name was spelt correctly in the original register but then copied wrongly at a later date - a poorly written cursive S could look like a D. If you have a GRO copy it might be worth checking with the local superintendant registrar's office to see if they will look at their copy of the register and see if the name was Sodden.