carol rowland

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: October 2003 Posts: 0 Send Message	Kim	Report	9 Sep 2006 22:39
Member Since: October 2003 Posts: 0 Send Message	I would be very suspicious , how can they have records that far back..... I think you can enter more or less anthying on it ,so unless you have the proof or can get it , take witha pinch salt. Kim
Member Since: March 2003 Posts: 1,501 Send Message	Willow	Report	9 Sep 2006 22:38
Member Since: March 2003 Posts: 1,501 Send Message	I would take it with a pinch of salt. The only research you can be 100% sure of is your own. No harm in emailing them though, perhaps they will share their parish records etc with you. p.s I have a contact who believes that we are related to Ann Boleyn, could say I nearly laughed my head off but I wont :-)
Member Since: July 2006 Posts: 0 Send Message	Carol	Report	9 Sep 2006 22:33
Member Since: July 2006 Posts: 0 Send Message	Does anybody know how accurate the one world tree is on ancestry? A couple of weeks ago I gave my gt gt grandads name - Jasper John Jasper born 1857 in Lambeth, Surrey.The results took me very far back, now tonight I have looked again and gone through a royal family, one is Henry 1 Beauclerc 1068 and at the top of the tree is a man called Frodi Dansson born 433.Does anyone know if this could be a wind up or if its there is must be right.